Comprehension
Read the situation below and answer the 3 associated questions:
Rakesh, who hailed from Dhanbad, worked in Jamshedpur with SPCIL, a government construction company.Although HR policies concerning job security & work-life balance attracted Rakesh to SPCIL, over time he found his work monotonous with no growth opportunities. However, the proximity to Dhanbad enabled him to visit his parents at his convenience.
Recently Rakesh applied to Grow and Prosper (G&P), a multinational company engaged in construction related operations, making inroads into many Indian states. G&P interviewed Rakesh and offered him three times his current salary at SPCIL.
Question: 1

While considering G&P’s offer,Rakesh pondered over the following facts:
1. A recent government policy made poor performance punishable by salary reduction or dismissal.
2. The first assignment at G&P is a bridge construction project in a village near Dhanbad.
3. With his current savings,Rakesh need not depend on regular income for at least six months.
4. Though an exemplary performer,Rakesh has hardly been recognized at SPCIL.
5. Based on the annual performance review at G&P,Rakesh will either earn double the salary or get fired.
Which of the following combinations of the above facts will BEST help Rakesh decide on joining G&P?

Updated On: Aug 25, 2025
  • 5, 4, 2
  • 1, 3, 4
  • 1, 4, 5
  • 2, 4, 3
  • 4, 3, 5
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is A

Solution and Explanation

To decide whether Rakesh should join G&P, we should focus on the following facts and their implications:
  1. Fact 5: At G&P, Rakesh can either earn double the salary or get fired. This fact shows both high reward and risk, drawing a direct connection to the nature of G&P's performance-based reward system.
  2. Fact 4: Rakesh has been an exemplary performer but unrecognized at SPCIL. This indicates that while he has not been appreciated for his skills and performance at SPCIL, G&P offers potential recognition through salary doubling based on performance.
  3. Fact 2: The first assignment at G&P is a bridge construction project near Dhanbad. Proximity to his home town offers personal benefits similar to those at SPCIL, maintaining his convenience in visiting family.
Combining these facts: Fact 5 motivates Rakesh from a career growth and financial advantage perspective. Fact 4 aligns with his desire for recognition, offering him better prospects at G&P. Fact 2 addresses the personal aspect, ensuring family connections remain strong despite a career switch. Together, these facts provide a balanced view, suggesting that the combination of opportunity, financial reward, and maintaining personal convenience aligns well with Rakesh's current situation and potential growth at G&P.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 2

While mulling over the offer,Rakesh consulted Manikandan,his trusted senior at SPCIL.Manikandan,who had friends in G&P,disclosed that it preferred government employees for its projects in Jharkhand,Biharand Chhattisgarh.“Once the project is completed, G&P may not need your skills,”observed Manikandan.Which of the following,if true, will BEST enable Rakesh to decide on the offer?

Updated On: Aug 25, 2025
  • During the interview, G&P quizzed if Rakesh would sustain his relationship with his former colleagues at SPCIL.
  • Through social media, Rakesh discovered that Manikandan’s contact, who had left SPCIL to join G&P, is no longer with G&P.
  • Senior-level employees at G&P,who began their career in similar projects,are now confined to their deskat the head office for almost a decade.
  • As G&P also planned to enter two Southern states, it has decided to recruit people from those states.
  • Manikandan stopped both of his sons from taking up private-sector jobs, given his loyalty to the government.
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is C

Solution and Explanation

The scenario involves Rakesh, who is contemplating a job offer from Grow and Prosper (G&P), which has offered him a much higher salary than his current government job at SPCIL. However, Rakesh needs to weigh various factors before making his decision. The best option to help Rakesh decide is linked to his career growth and stability with G&P.
  • During the interview, questioning about Rakesh's ability to maintain relationships with former colleagues at SPCIL does not directly address job security or growth prospects at G&P.
  • Rakesh finding out through social media about the departure of Manikandan's contact from G&P does provide insight but remains anecdotal and lacks concrete implications for the decision.
  • The insight that senior-level employees at G&P, who began their careers in similar projects, are now confined to their desks at the head office for almost a decade provides valuable information on career trajectory and potential stagnation. It hints at a lack of upward mobility and could indicate limited growth opportunity following the completion of the project, aligning with Manikandan's concerns about future demand for specific skills.
  • G&P's plans to recruit from southern states suggest expansion but do not directly relate to Rakesh's situation or prospects with the company.
  • Manikandan's personal decision regarding his sons' career paths reflects his loyalty to government jobs but does not offer relevance to Rakesh's decision-making process.
Given the objective of ensuring career growth and considering the risk of being confined without progress, understanding the career stagnation of seniors at G&P best supports Rakesh in evaluating long-term prospects, beyond immediate financial gain. Hence, the notable point here is "Senior-level employees at G&P, who began their careers in similar projects, are now confined to their desk at the head office for almost a decade."
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 3

Rakesh, in his current job, came across incidences of bribing by private sector officials. He wondered if he might have to bribe government officials while at G&P. He reflected on his interview with G&P:
1. The interviewers were puzzled how Rakesh could manage his EMIs with his current income.
2. One interviewer was constantly probing how Rakesh managed to meet his project deadlines with little cooperation from his subordinates.
3. “What would you do if your project has a fortnight’s deadline and it takes a month to obtain a permit?,” asked another interviewer.
4. A question that intrigued Rakesh was, “Should a pack of dacoits share their loot with one of their gang, who had killed a bystander against their motto ‘Thou shalt not kill’?”Which of the following sequences of the above statements is in the MOST appropriate DESCENDING order of bribing undertones?

Updated On: Aug 25, 2025
  • 3, 4, 1 ,2
  • 4, 3, 2, 1
  • 4, 1, 2, 3
  • 1, 3, 2, 4
  • 3, 1, 2, 4
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is

Solution and Explanation

To determine the descending order of bribing undertones in the interview questions posed to Rakesh, we must analyze each question based on how relevant they are to scenarios involving bribery or ethical dilemmas: 1. The question regarding meeting a fortnight’s deadline when a permit takes a month to obtain has strong bribing undertones, implying that the expectation might be to find a way to expedite the process, possibly through bribery (3). 2. The inquiry about managing EMIs with the current income suggests that additional, possibly unethical means, may be being employed to handle financial obligations (1). 3. The question probing project management amidst uncooperative subordinates could suggest unethical facilitation of work (2). 4. The question about the pack of dacoits, though intriguing, relates more to ethical values rather than directly suggesting bribery (4). Based on this analysis, the sequence '3, 1, 2, 4' is the most appropriate descending order of bribing undertones.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0

Top Questions on Caselets

View More Questions