Context: Mr. Singh had employed two part-time domestic helps, Vimla and Sharda. Vimla handled cleaning and dusting, while Sharda cooked. When Sharda fell ill and took leave for three days, Mr. Singh found that his gold ring was missing. Suspecting Vimla, he terminated her and offered Sharda a salary increase in exchange for additional cleaning duties. Sharda later found the ring but hesitated to inform Vimla about it, likely considering the ethical and professional ramifications.
Step 1: Analyze the situation. Sharda’s decision to inform Vimla could lead to complications, including reopening Vimla’s termination case and questioning Mr. Singh’s judgment. Additionally, it could affect Sharda’s relationship with Mr. Singh.
Step 2: Evaluate the options.
- Option 1: Mr. Singh terminating Sharda for sharing information is speculative and unlikely.
- Option 2: This directly ties Vimla’s performance to her dismissal and justifies Sharda’s hesitance.
- Option 3: While valid, this doesn’t provide strong reasoning for Sharda to avoid disclosing the information.
- Option 4: Sharda’s health concerns are unrelated to informing Vimla about the ring.
- Option 5: This does not address the key decision-making factor in this situation.
Step 3: Conclude the best answer. Option 2 provides the strongest justification for Sharda not informing Vimla, as it focuses on Vimla’s performance and its role in the events.
Final Answer: (2)
Step 1: Analyze Sharda’s options. Sharda must prioritize helping Vimla regain her reputation and potentially her job opportunities. Actions that escalate conflict or damage Sharda’s credibility should be avoided.
Step 2: Evaluate the options.
- Option 1: Confronting Mr. Singh might create conflict but does not directly assist Vimla.
- Option 2: Advising Vimla to seek compensation directly addresses her tarnished reputation and financial loss.
- Option 3: Informing other domestic helps might lead to gossip and unintended consequences.
- Option 4: Quitting the job is an emotional reaction that does not guarantee Vimla’s reinstatement.
- Option 5: Divulging information to Vimla’s employers could harm Sharda’s reputation and lead to further complications.
Step 3: Conclude the best action. Option 2 is the most constructive and practical approach to help Vimla.
Final Answer: (2)
Step 1: Identify key concerns. Employers often suspect domestic workers without concrete proof. Policies that deter baseless accusations and ensure accountability for employers can address these concerns.
Step 2: Evaluate the options.
- Option 1: Daily searches are invasive and likely to erode trust between employers and workers.
- Option 2: A one-month salary payment might deter employers but does not restore a worker’s reputation.
- Option 3: Submitting contact details does not address the issue of wrongful accusations.
- Option 4: Thorough searches are logical but insufficient to restore trust after accusations.
- Option 5: Public apologies can deter false accusations and rebuild trust, making it the most impactful policy.
Step 3: Conclude the best policy. Option 5 directly addresses the issue of accountability and restores trust between domestic workers and employers.
Final Answer: (5)