Step 1: Assess Nalini’s relationship with Shalini. Nalini values her relationship with Shalini and is hurt by the comments. Declining the bonus might seem like a way to maintain harmony, but it does not address her own achievements.
Step 2: Evaluate the options.
- Option 1: Knowing Shalini’s tendency to make insensitive comments might lessen the impact but does not address Nalini’s achievement.
- Option 2: Shalini’s confrontations with her boss are irrelevant to Nalini’s decision.
- Option 3: Being the first in her group to receive the bonus emphasizes Nalini’s uniqueness and could motivate her to keep it.
- Option 4: Loyalty-based rewards shift focus but lack emotional resonance for Nalini.
- Option 5: Shalini’s past irreverence distracts from the core issue of the bonus.
Step 3: Conclude the best reason. Option 3 highlights Nalini’s achievement within her peer group, encouraging her to accept the recognition.
Final Answer: (3)
Step 1: Identify the root cause. Nalini’s issue stems from a perceived favoritism, and ignoring the situation could further alienate her from her team.
Step 2: Evaluate the options.
- Option 1: Doing nothing risks worsening the problem and leaves room for further assumptions.
- Option 2: Confronting Shalini may escalate conflict rather than improve team dynamics.
- Option 3: Engaging with teammates and understanding their challenges fosters trust and collaboration.
- Option 4: Speaking negatively about bosses might backfire and damage her credibility.
- Option 5: Directly addressing indifference could create discomfort without resolving the underlying trust issues.
Step 3: Conclude the best course of action. Option 3 allows Nalini to build stronger personal relationships, addressing the root cause effectively.
Final Answer: (3)
Step 1: Analyze the situation. Nalini must consider Shalini’s previous performance, the client’s requirements, and team dynamics when deciding whether to include Shalini and whether she should lead the team.
Step 2: Evaluate the options.
- Option 1: This could create unnecessary conflict with Shalini and reduce team collaboration.
- Option 2: Asking Shalini to reconsider is a balanced approach that addresses both her concerns and the project’s needs.
- Option 3: Assigning Shalini as team leader without discussion could lead to dissatisfaction from Nalini and other team members.
- Option 4: Complaining to HR might escalate tensions unnecessarily and damage the team dynamic.
- Option 5: Requesting the boss to order Shalini to join the team could undermine Nalini’s authority as a team leader.
Step 3: Conclude the best course of action. Option 2 provides a diplomatic way to address Shalini’s concerns while ensuring the team works together effectively.
Final Answer: (2)