Step 1: Assess Nalini’s relationship with Shalini. Nalini values her relationship with Shalini and is hurt by the comments. Declining the bonus might seem like a way to maintain harmony, but it does not address her own achievements.
Step 2: Evaluate the options.
- Option 1: Knowing Shalini’s tendency to make insensitive comments might lessen the impact but does not address Nalini’s achievement.
- Option 2: Shalini’s confrontations with her boss are irrelevant to Nalini’s decision.
- Option 3: Being the first in her group to receive the bonus emphasizes Nalini’s uniqueness and could motivate her to keep it.
- Option 4: Loyalty-based rewards shift focus but lack emotional resonance for Nalini.
- Option 5: Shalini’s past irreverence distracts from the core issue of the bonus.
Step 3: Conclude the best reason. Option 3 highlights Nalini’s achievement within her peer group, encouraging her to accept the recognition.
Final Answer: (3)
Step 1: Identify the root cause. Nalini’s issue stems from a perceived favoritism, and ignoring the situation could further alienate her from her team.
Step 2: Evaluate the options.
- Option 1: Doing nothing risks worsening the problem and leaves room for further assumptions.
- Option 2: Confronting Shalini may escalate conflict rather than improve team dynamics.
- Option 3: Engaging with teammates and understanding their challenges fosters trust and collaboration.
- Option 4: Speaking negatively about bosses might backfire and damage her credibility.
- Option 5: Directly addressing indifference could create discomfort without resolving the underlying trust issues.
Step 3: Conclude the best course of action. Option 3 allows Nalini to build stronger personal relationships, addressing the root cause effectively.
Final Answer: (3)
Step 1: Analyze the situation. Nalini must consider Shalini’s previous performance, the client’s requirements, and team dynamics when deciding whether to include Shalini and whether she should lead the team.
Step 2: Evaluate the options.
- Option 1: This could create unnecessary conflict with Shalini and reduce team collaboration.
- Option 2: Asking Shalini to reconsider is a balanced approach that addresses both her concerns and the project’s needs.
- Option 3: Assigning Shalini as team leader without discussion could lead to dissatisfaction from Nalini and other team members.
- Option 4: Complaining to HR might escalate tensions unnecessarily and damage the team dynamic.
- Option 5: Requesting the boss to order Shalini to join the team could undermine Nalini’s authority as a team leader.
Step 3: Conclude the best course of action. Option 2 provides a diplomatic way to address Shalini’s concerns while ensuring the team works together effectively.
Final Answer: (2)
Mr. Zubin Mistry is the owner and the chief editor of the newspaper The Pluralist, renowned for its high reporting standards and outstanding writing quality. The Pluralist’s authentic reporting distinguishes it from other newspapers that sensationalize news. They are responsible employers, known to be highly supportive towards their employees. Its news editing team is led by Ms. Ramya Kattabomman, a respected veteran in the newspaper reporting industry, wellknown for her stringent adherence to the ethical standards of newspaper reporting.
Mr. Aditya Swaroop Verma, an award-winning senior journalist, has brought in an exposé into the activities of a mining company, operating in an ecologically vulnerable area. In his hardhitting reporting style, he has presented interviews with tens of people, delineating how the mining company has used illegal means to start mining in that area. These mining activities may lead to the destruction of the local ecological balance. However, Aditya Swaroop is unable to obtain an interview with the management of the mining company.
Aditya Swaroop’s investigative report article offers signi cant revelations about the alleged illegal activities of the mining company which were hardly covered in the media otherwise. Nevertheless, his sources have requested for complete anonymity
Ned Flanders and Homer Simpson Partners Limited is a law rm, known for its unwavering commitment to client satisfaction. They treat the clients as family members who have grown along with the rm. Further, they are highly regarded in the industry, consulted by the country’s top organizations. Among the founders, Homer Simpson is amboyant, while Ned Flanders is serious. Together, they bring a dynamic balance to the team.
The organization believes in a strong socialization ritual that bonds the new lawyers (newcomers) with the existing members. Also, the socialization ritual ensures that newcomers fully understand the nature of their work and integrate seamlessly into the company’s culture. During their rst week, newcomers are overloaded with a barrage of artificial tasks, unexpected client calls, and a challenging meeting with the founders. This results in newcomers getting overwhelmed, and doubting their decision to join the rm, only for the founders to meet them and reveal that this is one big prank and a way to welcome them to the organization. This socialization ritual has served them well for the past two decades. However, not all the newcomers appreciate the utility of this ritual.
One of the lawyers, Ms. Lisa Simpleton, who joined in 2023 and went through the same socialization ritual, found it unwelcoming. She believes that other newcomers might also share the same opinion. Lisa thinks that the current generation, especially post-COVID, needs more friendly welcome, and the rm must put an end to this ritual.
Match the following authors with their respective works.
Authors | Books |
---|---|
1. Andy Weir | A. Dune |
2. Cixin Liu | B. The Time Machine |
3. Stephen Hawking | C. The Brief History of Time |
4. HG Wells | D. The Martian |
5. Frank Herbert | E. The Three Body Problem |