Step 1: Understand Vineeta’s dilemma.
Vineeta is considering replacing her old car with a new SUV but needs key information to
make an informed decision.
Step 2: Evaluate the impact of the options.
- Option 1: Lacks actionable information for decision-making.
- Option 2: Provides a personal opinion but lacks relevance to her local context.
- Option 3: Waiting period and color preference are minor considerations.
- Option 4: Parking issues are common in Jampur but do not affect the purchase decision.
- Option 5: Introduction of Panther Motors, a leading brand, offers a competitive alternative.
Final Answer: (5)
Step 1: Analyze the scenario.
Shyam must resolve the issue without risking his relationship with Vineeta or affecting his dealership’s reputation.
Step 2: Evaluate the combinations.
- Option 1 (A & B): While A and B acknowledge Vineeta’s satisfaction and the error, they do not offer a way to avoid financial recovery from Vineeta. - Option 2 (A & D): Vineeta’s brother’s knowledge may support Shyam, but A does not directly prevent recovery.
- Option 3 (C & D): Vineeta’s network is beneficial, but her brother’s knowledge may not persuade Shyam against recovery.
- Option 4 (C & E): Vineeta’s network offers Shyam potential new business, and maintaining sales volume may help recover the loss indirectly.
- Option 5 (B &E): While B and E indicate alternate routes, they do not leverage Vineeta’s potential to benefit Shyam’s dealership.
Final Answer: (4)
Step 1: Analyze the context.
Vineeta benefited from an unintended extended warranty during her time of need. However, her rationale for not paying should focus on fairness and context.
Step 2: Evaluate the options.
- Option 1: The price comparison is irrelevant since the extended warranty was unrelated to the SUV’s base price.
- Option 2: While true, it does not justify why she should avoid reimbursing Shyam.
- Option 3: The passage of time does not eliminate the ethical consideration of reimbursement.
- Option 4: Highlights that her awareness of the warranty was circumstantial and she would not have considered reimbursing otherwise. This directly supports her stance.
- Option 5: Assumes intent and does not address the situation directly.
Final Answer: (4)