Facial (fac) and meridional (mer) isomers are types of geometric isomers found in octahedral complexes with the general formula \([MA_3B_3]\). In these complexes, three identical ligands can either be adjacent to each other forming a 'facial' configuration or adjacent to form a 'meridional' configuration.
Let's analyze why the other complexes do not show fac-mer isomerism:
Thus, the correct complex exhibiting facial-meridional isomerism is \([Co(NH_3)_3Cl_3]\).
To determine which complex shows facial-meridional isomerism, we first need to understand what these terms mean:
Now, let's evaluate the given complexes:
\([Co(NH_3)_3Cl_3]\): This complex can display facial-meridional isomerism as it is an octahedral complex with three amine ligands and three chloride ligands, allowing for both fac-arrangement (three Cl or NH3 occupy one face) and mer-arrangement (three Cl or NH3 in a plane).
\([Co(NH_3)_4Cl_2]^+\): This complex cannot exhibit this isomerism as it lacks three identical ligands that could form a face.
\([Co(en)_3]^{3+}\): This complex is homoleptic, consisting of three ethylenediamine (\(en\)) ligands that do not allow for facial-meridional distinction.
\([Co(en)_2Cl_2]^+\): Similar to the above, this complex cannot show facial-meridional isomerism as it has only two Cl ions, preventing the formation necessary for fac-mer isomerism.
Thus, the correct complex that shows facial-meridional isomerism is:
\([Co(NH_3)_3Cl_3]\)

Two circular discs of radius \(10\) cm each are joined at their centres by a rod, as shown in the figure. The length of the rod is \(30\) cm and its mass is \(600\) g. The mass of each disc is also \(600\) g. If the applied torque between the two discs is \(43\times10^{-7}\) dyne·cm, then the angular acceleration of the system about the given axis \(AB\) is ________ rad s\(^{-2}\).
