$( S 1)(p \Rightarrow q) \vee(p \wedge(\sim q))$ is a tautology(S2) $((\sim p) \Rightarrow(\sim q)) \wedge((\sim p) \vee q)$ is a contradictionThen
| p | q | p ⇒ q | ∼q | p∧∼q | (p ⇒ q) ∨ (p∧∼q) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T | T | T | F | F | T |
| T | F | F | T | T | T |
| F | T | T | F | F | T |
| F | F | T | T | F | T |
| ∼p | ∼q | ∼p ⇒ ∼q | ∼p ∨ q | ((∼p) ⇒ (∼q)) ∧ (∼p)∨q) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | F | T | T | T |
| F | T | T | F | F |
| T | F | F | T | F |
| T | T | T | T | T |
Step 1: Analyze \( S1 \): \[ S1 = (p \Rightarrow q) \vee (p \land \neg q). \] Let's check its truth table: \[ \begin{array}{|c|c|c|c|} \hline p & q & p \Rightarrow q & p \land \neg q \\ \hline T & T & T & F \\ T & F & F & T \\ F & T & T & F \\ F & F & T & F \\ \hline \end{array} \] For \( (p \Rightarrow q) \vee (p \land \neg q) \), we evaluate the disjunction in each case:
- When \( p = T \) and \( q = T \), \( (p \Rightarrow q) = T \), and \( (p \land \neg q) = F \), so the result is \( T \).
- When \( p = T \) and \( q = F \), \( (p \Rightarrow q) = F \), and \( (p \land \neg q) = T \), so the result is \( T \).
- When \( p = F \) and \( q = T \), \( (p \Rightarrow q) = T \), and \( (p \land \neg q) = F \), so the result is \( T \).
- When \( p = F \) and \( q = F \), \( (p \Rightarrow q) = T \), and \( (p \land \neg q) = F \), so the result is \( T \).
Thus, it evaluates to true in all cases, which means \( S1 \) is a tautology.
Step 2: Analyze \( S2 \): \[ S2 = (\neg p) \Rightarrow (\neg q) \land ((\neg p) \vee q). \] Let's check its truth table: \[ \begin{array}{|c|c|c|c|c|c|} \hline p & q & \neg p & \neg q & (\neg p) \Rightarrow (\neg q) & (\neg p) \vee q \\ \hline T & T & F & F & T & T \\ T & F & F & T & T & F \\ F & T & T & F & F & T \\ F & F & T & T & T & T \\ \hline \end{array} \] From the truth table, we see that \( S2 \) does not evaluate to false for all cases, meaning \( S2 \) is not a contradiction. It evaluates to true in some cases, and therefore \( S2 \) is not incorrect but has cases where it is true.
If
\( p \): It is raining today,
\( q \): I go to school,
\( r \): I shall meet my friends,
and \( s \): I shall go for a movie, then which of the following represents:
"If it does not rain or if I do not go to school, then I shall meet my friend and go for a movie?"
Method used for separation of mixture of products (B and C) obtained in the following reaction is: 
In the following \(p\text{–}V\) diagram, the equation of state along the curved path is given by \[ (V-2)^2 = 4ap, \] where \(a\) is a constant. The total work done in the closed path is: 
Let \( ABC \) be a triangle. Consider four points \( p_1, p_2, p_3, p_4 \) on the side \( AB \), five points \( p_5, p_6, p_7, p_8, p_9 \) on the side \( BC \), and four points \( p_{10}, p_{11}, p_{12}, p_{13} \) on the side \( AC \). None of these points is a vertex of the triangle \( ABC \). Then the total number of pentagons that can be formed by taking all the vertices from the points \( p_1, p_2, \ldots, p_{13} \) is ___________.
Mathematical reasoning or the principle of mathematical reasoning is a part of mathematics where we decide the truth values of the given statements. These reasoning statements are common in most competitive exams like JEE and the questions are extremely easy and fun to solve.
Mathematically, reasoning can be of two major types such as: