Given that \(a, b, c\) are in arithmetic progression, we have:
\[ 2b = a + c \]
Since \(a + 1, b, c + 3\) are in geometric progression, we know:
\[ b^2 = (a + 1)(c + 3) \]
We are also given that the arithmetic mean of \(a, b, c\) is \(8\):
\[ \frac{a + b + c}{3} = 8 \implies a + b + c = 24 \]
Substituting \(b = 8\) (from \(a + b + c = 24\)), we get \(a + c = 16\).
Now, substituting in the geometric progression condition:
\[ 64 = (a + 1)(c + 3) = (a + 1)(19 - a) \]
Expanding and rearranging:
\[ a^2 - 18a + 45 = 0 \]
Solving this quadratic equation for \(a > 10\), we find \(a = 15\) and \(c = 1\).
Thus, the geometric mean of \(a, b, c\) is:
\[ \sqrt[3]{abc} = \sqrt[3]{15 \times 8 \times 1} = 120 \]
Consider the following sequence of reactions : 
Molar mass of the product formed (A) is ______ g mol\(^{-1}\).
In a Young's double slit experiment, three polarizers are kept as shown in the figure. The transmission axes of \( P_1 \) and \( P_2 \) are orthogonal to each other. The polarizer \( P_3 \) covers both the slits with its transmission axis at \( 45^\circ \) to those of \( P_1 \) and \( P_2 \). An unpolarized light of wavelength \( \lambda \) and intensity \( I_0 \) is incident on \( P_1 \) and \( P_2 \). The intensity at a point after \( P_3 \), where the path difference between the light waves from \( S_1 \) and \( S_2 \) is \( \frac{\lambda}{3} \), is:
