To solve the problem, we are given the parametric equations of a line:
\( x = 1 + 5\mu \), \( y = -5 + \mu \), and \( z = -6 - 3\mu \)
We need to check which of the given points satisfies all three equations for some value of \( \mu \).
1. Check Option (A): (1, -5, 6)
Try substituting into the equations:
- From \( x = 1 + 5\mu \), putting \( x = 1 \):
\( 1 = 1 + 5\mu \Rightarrow \mu = 0 \)
- Check \( y = -5 + \mu = -5 + 0 = -5 \) ✔️
- Check \( z = -6 - 3\mu = -6 - 0 = -6 \) ❌ (Expected z = 6, but we get -6)
So, (A) is not on the line.
2. Check Option (B): (1, 5, 6)
- \( 1 = 1 + 5\mu \Rightarrow \mu = 0 \)
- \( y = -5 + 0 = -5 \) ❌ (Expected y = 5)
So, (B) is not on the line.
3. Check Option (C): (1, -5, -6)
- \( 1 = 1 + 5\mu \Rightarrow \mu = 0 \)
- \( y = -5 + 0 = -5 \) ✔️
- \( z = -6 - 3(0) = -6 \) ✔️
All three coordinates satisfy the line’s equations when \( \mu = 0 \).
4. Conclusion:
The point (1, -5, -6) lies on the line.
Final Answer:
The correct option is (C) (1, -5, -6).

Rishika and Shivika were partners in a firm sharing profits and losses in the ratio of 3 : 2. Their Balance Sheet as at 31st March, 2024 stood as follows:
Balance Sheet of Rishika and Shivika as at 31st March, 2024
| Liabilities | Amount (₹) | Assets | Amount (₹) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capitals: | Equipment | 45,00,000 | |
| Rishika – ₹30,00,000 Shivika – ₹20,00,000 | 50,00,000 | Investments | 5,00,000 |
| Shivika’s Husband’s Loan | 5,00,000 | Debtors | 35,00,000 |
| Creditors | 40,00,000 | Stock | 8,00,000 |
| Cash at Bank | 2,00,000 | ||
| Total | 95,00,000 | Total | 95,00,000 |
The firm was dissolved on the above date and the following transactions took place:
(i) Equipements were given to creditors in full settlement of their account.
(ii) Investments were sold at a profit of 20% on its book value.
(iii) Full amount was collected from debtors.
(iv) Stock was taken over by Rishika at 50% discount.
(v) Actual expenses of realisation amounted to ₹ 2,00,000 which were paid by the firm. Prepare Realisation Account.