The groups of students who have an affinity for Sunita and Ragini are mutually exclusive sets. Consequently, the Venn diagram can be represented as follows. In total, there are 500 students.
Considering statement (2):
Referring to statement (1):
Derived from (2):
Following (4):
Based on (6):
As per (7):
Given that 250 students support B, it follows that the remaining 250 do not endorse B.
According to (5):
In conclusion, the final solution is outlined as above.
The required value is \(\frac{160}{250}\times100=64\)
The groups of students who have an affinity for Sunita and Ragini are mutually exclusive sets. Consequently, the Venn diagram can be represented as follows. In total, there are 500 students.
Considering statement (2):
Referring to statement (1):
Derived from (2):
Following (4):
Based on (6):
As per (7):
Given that 250 students support B, it follows that the remaining 250 do not endorse B.
According to (5):
In conclusion, the final solution is outlined as above.
The required value is \(\frac{210}{250}\times100=84\)
The groups of students who have an affinity for Sunita and Ragini are mutually exclusive sets. Consequently, the Venn diagram can be represented as follows. In total, there are 500 students.
Considering statement (2):
Referring to statement (1):
Derived from (2):
Following (4):
Based on (6):
As per (7):
Given that 250 students support B, it follows that the remaining 250 do not endorse B.
According to (5):
In conclusion, the final solution is outlined as above.
The required value is \(\frac{50}{250}\times100=50\)
The groups of students who have an affinity for Sunita and Ragini are mutually exclusive sets. Consequently, the Venn diagram can be represented as follows. In total, there are 500 students.
Considering statement (2):
Referring to statement (1):
Derived from (2):
Following (4):
Based on (6):
As per (7):
Given that 250 students support B, it follows that the remaining 250 do not endorse B.
According to (5):
In conclusion, the final solution is outlined as above.
The students who supported proposal B but not A are represented by b(Sunita) and b(Ragini). Specifically, among them, those who supported Ragini are denoted by b(Ragini) = 150.
At InnovateX, six employees, Asha, Bunty, Chintu, Dolly, Eklavya, and Falguni, were split into two groups of three each: Elite led by Manager Kuku, and Novice led by Manager Lalu. At the end of each quarter, Kuku and Lalu handed out ratings to all members in their respective groups. In each group, each employee received a distinct integer rating from 1 to 3. & nbsp;
The score for an employee at the end of a quarter is defined as their cumulative rating from the beginning of the year. At the end of each quarter the employee in Novice with the highest score was promoted to Elite, and the employee in Elite with the minimum score was demoted to Novice. If there was a tie in scores, the employee with a higher rating in the latest quarter was ranked higher.
1. Asha, Bunty, and Chintu were in Elite at the beginning of Quarter 1. All of them were in Novice at the beginning of Quarter 4.
2. Dolly and Falguni were the only employees who got the same rating across all the quarters.
3. The following is known about ratings given by Lalu (Novice manager):
– Bunty received a rating of 1 in Quarter 2. & nbsp;
– Asha and Dolly received ratings of 1 and 2, respectively, in Quarter 3.