| Time Slot | Students |
|---|---|
| 9:00 am | B, E (T) |
| 9:30 am | C, G |
| 10:00 am | A |
| 10:30 am | F |
To determine who is not guiding any Economics student, we need to analyze the given conditions:
Next, we process each condition consecutively.
Now, let's allocate guides to the remaining students:
The Economics students are A, C if Economics, the student guided by T, and one guided by R.
Finally, check the options to find who is not guiding any Economics students:
The correct answer is: P, Q, and S.
The goal is to determine which statement is necessarily true based on the given information. Analyzing the constraints:
| Slot | Guided by | Student | Department |
|---|---|---|---|
| 9:00 am | P | B/C | Sociology/Economics |
| 9:30 am | T | Economics | |
| 10:00 am | R | A | Economics |
| 10:30 am | S | F | Anthropology |
To solve the problem based on the given constraints, we need to arrange the seminars of the mentioned students according to the information provided. Below are the steps:
Thus, the statements: (i) E and H are guided by T and (ii) G is guided by Q, are both true.
Given the provided information and constraints, we'll analyze the scheduling to determine the relationship between D, H, and T when E and Q are in the same slot.
Thus, at least one of D and H is guided by T, as indicated. Verified by chain and certified inferences.
Given the scheduling constraints:
Now addressing the question: If D is immediately before Q's slot, deduce if this affects statements:
So, the statement E is guided by R is the only one not necessarily fixed, reflecting potential flexibility based on the 10:00 am or remaining swaps around D and Q, confirming our given correct answer matches logical deduction.
