| Time Slot | Students |
|---|---|
| 9:00 am | B, E (T) |
| 9:30 am | C, G |
| 10:00 am | A |
| 10:30 am | F |
To determine who is not guiding any Economics student, we need to analyze the given conditions:
Next, we process each condition consecutively.
Now, let's allocate guides to the remaining students:
The Economics students are A, C if Economics, the student guided by T, and one guided by R.
Finally, check the options to find who is not guiding any Economics students:
The correct answer is: P, Q, and S.
The goal is to determine which statement is necessarily true based on the given information. Analyzing the constraints:
| Slot | Guided by | Student | Department |
|---|---|---|---|
| 9:00 am | P | B/C | Sociology/Economics |
| 9:30 am | T | Economics | |
| 10:00 am | R | A | Economics |
| 10:30 am | S | F | Anthropology |
To solve the problem based on the given constraints, we need to arrange the seminars of the mentioned students according to the information provided. Below are the steps:
Thus, the statements: (i) E and H are guided by T and (ii) G is guided by Q, are both true.
Given the provided information and constraints, we'll analyze the scheduling to determine the relationship between D, H, and T when E and Q are in the same slot.
Thus, at least one of D and H is guided by T, as indicated. Verified by chain and certified inferences.
Given the scheduling constraints:
Now addressing the question: If D is immediately before Q's slot, deduce if this affects statements:
So, the statement E is guided by R is the only one not necessarily fixed, reflecting potential flexibility based on the 10:00 am or remaining swaps around D and Q, confirming our given correct answer matches logical deduction.
At InnovateX, six employees, Asha, Bunty, Chintu, Dolly, Eklavya, and Falguni, were split into two groups of three each: Elite led by Manager Kuku, and Novice led by Manager Lalu. At the end of each quarter, Kuku and Lalu handed out ratings to all members in their respective groups. In each group, each employee received a distinct integer rating from 1 to 3. & nbsp;
The score for an employee at the end of a quarter is defined as their cumulative rating from the beginning of the year. At the end of each quarter the employee in Novice with the highest score was promoted to Elite, and the employee in Elite with the minimum score was demoted to Novice. If there was a tie in scores, the employee with a higher rating in the latest quarter was ranked higher.
1. Asha, Bunty, and Chintu were in Elite at the beginning of Quarter 1. All of them were in Novice at the beginning of Quarter 4.
2. Dolly and Falguni were the only employees who got the same rating across all the quarters.
3. The following is known about ratings given by Lalu (Novice manager):
– Bunty received a rating of 1 in Quarter 2. & nbsp;
– Asha and Dolly received ratings of 1 and 2, respectively, in Quarter 3.