We are given two equivalence relations \( R \) and \( S \) on a non-void set \( A \), and we are asked to analyze the properties of the union and intersection of these relations.
Step 1: Properties of Equivalence Relations
An equivalence relation on a set must satisfy three properties: 1. **Reflexivity**: \( a \sim a \) for all \( a \in A \). 2. **Symmetry**: If \( a \sim b \), then \( b \sim a \). 3. **Transitivity**: If \( a \sim b \) and \( b \sim c \), then \( a \sim c \).
Step 2: Intersection of Equivalence Relations
The intersection of two equivalence relations \( R \cap S \) is an equivalence relation. To see this: - Reflexivity: Since both \( R \) and \( S \) are reflexive, \( a \sim a \) for all \( a \in A \), and thus \( a \sim a \) holds in \( R \cap S \). - Symmetry: If \( a \sim b \) in \( R \cap S \), then \( a \sim b \) in both \( R \) and \( S \), so \( b \sim a \) in both relations. Hence, \( a \sim b \) implies \( b \sim a \) in \( R \cap S \). - Transitivity: If \( a \sim b \) and \( b \sim c \) in \( R \cap S \), then \( a \sim b \) and \( b \sim c \) in both \( R \) and \( S \). Since both \( R \) and \( S \) are transitive, \( a \sim c \) in both \( R \) and \( S \), so \( a \sim c \) in \( R \cap S \). Thus, \( R \cap S \) is an equivalence relation.
Step 3: Union of Equivalence Relations
The union of two equivalence relations \( R \cup S \) is **not** necessarily an equivalence relation. To see this, consider the transitivity property: - While both \( R \) and \( S \) are transitive, the union \( R \cup S \) may not be transitive. For example, if \( a \sim b \) in \( R \) and \( b \sim c \) in \( S \), but there is no direct relation between \( a \) and \( c \) in \( R \cup S \), transitivity will fail. Thus, \( R \cup S \) is not an equivalence relation.
\[ \boxed{R \cap S \text{ is an equivalence relation, and } R \cup S \text{ is not an equivalence relation.}} \]
Let $R$ be a relation defined on the set $\{1,2,3,4\times\{1,2,3,4\}$ by \[ R=\{((a,b),(c,d)) : 2a+3b=3c+4d\} \] Then the number of elements in $R$ is
Let \(M = \{1, 2, 3, ....., 16\}\), if a relation R defined on set M such that R = \((x, y) : 4y = 5x – 3, x, y (\in) M\). How many elements should be added to R to make it symmetric.

Which of the following statement(s) is/are correct about the given compound?
