We are given two equivalence relations \( R \) and \( S \) on a non-void set \( A \), and we are asked to analyze the properties of the union and intersection of these relations.
Step 1: Properties of Equivalence Relations
An equivalence relation on a set must satisfy three properties: 1. **Reflexivity**: \( a \sim a \) for all \( a \in A \). 2. **Symmetry**: If \( a \sim b \), then \( b \sim a \). 3. **Transitivity**: If \( a \sim b \) and \( b \sim c \), then \( a \sim c \).
Step 2: Intersection of Equivalence Relations
The intersection of two equivalence relations \( R \cap S \) is an equivalence relation. To see this: - Reflexivity: Since both \( R \) and \( S \) are reflexive, \( a \sim a \) for all \( a \in A \), and thus \( a \sim a \) holds in \( R \cap S \). - Symmetry: If \( a \sim b \) in \( R \cap S \), then \( a \sim b \) in both \( R \) and \( S \), so \( b \sim a \) in both relations. Hence, \( a \sim b \) implies \( b \sim a \) in \( R \cap S \). - Transitivity: If \( a \sim b \) and \( b \sim c \) in \( R \cap S \), then \( a \sim b \) and \( b \sim c \) in both \( R \) and \( S \). Since both \( R \) and \( S \) are transitive, \( a \sim c \) in both \( R \) and \( S \), so \( a \sim c \) in \( R \cap S \). Thus, \( R \cap S \) is an equivalence relation.
Step 3: Union of Equivalence Relations
The union of two equivalence relations \( R \cup S \) is **not** necessarily an equivalence relation. To see this, consider the transitivity property: - While both \( R \) and \( S \) are transitive, the union \( R \cup S \) may not be transitive. For example, if \( a \sim b \) in \( R \) and \( b \sim c \) in \( S \), but there is no direct relation between \( a \) and \( c \) in \( R \cup S \), transitivity will fail. Thus, \( R \cup S \) is not an equivalence relation.
\[ \boxed{R \cap S \text{ is an equivalence relation, and } R \cup S \text{ is not an equivalence relation.}} \]
Let $ A = \{-2, -1, 0, 1, 2, 3\} $. Let $ R $ be a relation on $ A $ defined by $ (x, y) \in R $ if and only if $ |x| \le |y| $. Let $ m $ be the number of reflexive elements in $ R $ and $ n $ be the minimum number of elements required to be added in $ R $ to make it reflexive and symmetric relations, respectively. Then $ l + m + n $ is equal to
If the domain of the function $ f(x) = \log_7(1 - \log_4(x^2 - 9x + 18)) $ is $ (\alpha, \beta) \cup (\gamma, \delta) $, then $ \alpha + \beta + \gamma + \delta $ is equal to
Let A = $\{-3,-2,-1,0,1,2,3\}$. Let R be a relation on A defined by xRy if and only if $ 0 \le x^2 + 2y \le 4 $. Let $ l $ be the number of elements in R and m be the minimum number of elements required to be added in R to make it a reflexive relation. then $ l + m $ is equal to
A quantity \( X \) is given by: \[ X = \frac{\epsilon_0 L \Delta V}{\Delta t} \] where:
- \( \epsilon_0 \) is the permittivity of free space,
- \( L \) is the length,
- \( \Delta V \) is the potential difference,
- \( \Delta t \) is the time interval.
The dimension of \( X \) is the same as that of: