Question:

Legal Principle: Justice should not only be done, but also be seen to be done.

Facts:
L, an honest lawyer, had 200 shares in Company X.
Later, L was elevated to the High Court as a Judge and had to deal with Company matters.
A dispute between Company X and its creditors came before L for decision.
Which among the following proposition is true?

Show Hint

In judicial ethics, even the perception of bias is unacceptable. Judges must recuse themselves from cases where any potential conflict of interest exists, however small.
Updated On: Aug 14, 2025
  • L, as an honest person, will definitely judge the matter on the merits only. So, the principle cannot apply.
  • A judge cannot excuse himself from taking up a case posted before him by the Court Registry.
  • L should refrain from hearing the matter as he holds shares of the Company X.
  • Since L has only 200 shares, he has no substantial interest in the company and hence can decide the matter.
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is C

Solution and Explanation


Step 1: Understanding the Legal Principle
The principle states that justice must be delivered impartially and must also appear impartial to the public. Any potential bias — even if only perceived — can undermine public trust in the judicial process.
Step 2: Applying the Facts
Here, L is a shareholder in Company X. This creates a direct conflict of interest in any dispute involving Company X because L could benefit financially from the decision. Even if L is completely honest, the mere fact that he holds shares can raise doubts about his impartiality.
Step 3: Evaluating the Options
- Option 1: Incorrect — Integrity alone is not enough; perception of bias must also be avoided.
- Option 2: Incorrect — Judges can recuse themselves to avoid conflicts of interest.
- Option 3: Correct — L should refrain from hearing the case due to shareholding, to maintain both actual and perceived impartiality.
- Option 4: Incorrect — Even a small holding can be enough to create a perceived conflict of interest.
Step 4: Conclusion
The correct approach is for L to recuse himself, ensuring that justice is not only done but also seen to be done.
\[ \boxed{\text{L should not hear the case involving Company X due to conflict of interest.}} \]
Was this answer helpful?
0
0

Questions Asked in CLAT exam

View More Questions