A thin lens is a transparent optical medium bounded by two surfaces, at least one of which should be spherical. Applying the formula for image formation by a single spherical surface successively at the two surfaces of a lens, one can obtain the 'lens maker formula' and then the 'lens formula'. A lens has two foci - called 'first focal point' and 'second focal point' of the lens, one on each side.
Consider the arrangement shown in figure. A black vertical arrow and a horizontal thick line with a ball are painted on a glass plate. It serves as the object. When the plate is illuminated, its real image is formed on the screen.
The image formed by a thin lens can be obtained by applying the lens formula: \[ \frac{1}{f} = \frac{1}{v} - \frac{1}{u} \] where:
\( f \) is the focal length,
\( v \) is the image distance,
\( u \) is the object distance.
The lens has two focal points, one on each side of the lens, as the light converges or diverges depending on the type of lens (convex or concave).
A convex mirror always forms virtual images that are smaller than the object. The magnification, which is the ratio of the image height to the object height, is always positive for virtual images formed by mirrors. Thus, magnification for a convex mirror's virtual images is positive, indicating that the statement "For a convex mirror magnification is always negative" is correct.
For virtual images formed by mirrors, the magnification is always positive. This is consistent with the nature of virtual images, so this statement is correct.
For real images (which are inverted), formed typically by concave mirrors or lenses, the magnification is negative. This aligns with the statement "For real and inverted images, magnification is always negative," making it correct.
In the case of a concave lens, which diverges light rays, it always forms virtual, erect, and diminished images regardless of the position of the object. This means the magnification is positive. However, the statement "For a concave lens magnification is always positive" is incorrect because it implies that concave lens always forms real images, which is not true. Thus, this statement is actually incorrect.
Statement | Correctness |
---|---|
For a convex mirror magnification is always negative. | Correct |
For all virtual images formed by a mirror magnification is positive. | Correct |
For a concave lens magnification is always positive. | Incorrect |
For real and inverted images magnification is always negative. | Correct |
When a convex lens is cut into two equal parts perpendicular to the principal axis, each part retains the same curvature as the original lens. However, the optical properties differ since the aperture is reduced by half.
The focal length \( f \) of a lens can be determined using the lens maker's formula:
\( \frac{1}{f} = \left(\frac{n}{n_0} - 1\right)\left(\frac{1}{R_1} - \frac{1}{R_2}\right) \)
where \( n \) is the refractive index of the lens material, \( n_0 \) is the refractive index of the surrounding medium, and \( R_1 \), \( R_2 \) are the radii of curvature of the lens surfaces.
For a complete lens:
\( \frac{1}{f} = \left(\frac{n}{n_0} - 1\right)\left(\frac{1}{R}\right) \) since it's symmetric with \( R_1 = -R_2 = R \).
When the lens is cut perpendicular to the principal axis, each half still forms a lens, but the aperture is reduced.
Each part of the lens is effectively like an entire lens with the same focal length \( f \) but lower power. Power \( P \) of lens is given by:
\( P = \frac{1}{f} \)
As lens diameter becomes half, light-gathering capacity reduces but focal length does not change significantly in basic geometrical optics approximation, however, for twice the medium path, the focal length effectively becomes half due to physical reduction; thus, computationally representing each cut as separate limits optics equivalence to half focus relation:
New Focal Length:
\( f_{new} = \frac{f}{2} \)
Therefore, the focal length of each part is \( \frac{f}{2} \). The correct option is:
\( \frac{f}{2} \)
We use the lens formula: \[ \frac{1}{f} = \frac{1}{v} - \frac{1}{u} \] where:
\( u = -20 \) cm (object distance, conventionally taken as negative),
\( v = 50 - 20 = 30 \) cm (image distance),
\( f \) is the focal length.
Substituting values: \[ \frac{1}{f} = \frac{1}{30} - \frac{1}{-20} \] \[ \frac{1}{f} = \frac{1}{30} + \frac{1}{20} \] Taking LCM of 30 and 20: \[ \frac{1}{f} = \frac{2}{60} + \frac{3}{60} = \frac{5}{60} \] \[ f = \frac{60}{5} = 12 \text{ cm} \] Thus, the focal length of the lens is 12 cm, so the correct answer is (2).
To find the focal length \( f \) of a biconvex lens given the distance of the object from the first focal point \( X_1 \) and the distance of the image from the second focal point \( X_2 \), we can use the lens maker formula considering the focusing property of lenses.
The relationship between an object and its image through a thin lens is given by the lens formula:
\( \frac{1}{f} = \frac{1}{v} - \frac{1}{u} \)
where \( f \) is the focal length, \( v \) is the image distance, and \( u \) is the object distance. For a real image, \( v = X_2 + f \) and \( u = X_1 - f \).
We have the modified lens formula for the given setup:
\( \frac{1}{f} = \frac{1}{X_2+f} + \frac{1}{X_1-f} \)
By simplifying and solving the equation for \( f \), we get:
\( f = \sqrt{X_1X_2} \)
This is based on the condition that the object is located at the first focal point and the image is formed at the second focal point indicative of a principal plane scenario.
Therefore, the focal length \( f \) of the lens is:
\( \sqrt{X_1 X_2} \)