When a plane wave travels from one medium to another, its direction of propagation changes due to the difference in the speed of light in the two media. This phenomenon is called refraction. The angle of incidence in the denser medium is related to the angle of refraction in the rarer medium by Snell’s law.
Below is the diagram showing the refraction of a plane wave at the boundary between two media:
Incident plane wave in denser medium
↓
Angle of incidence (i)
Refraction occurs at the boundary
↓
Angle of refraction (r) in the rarer medium
Snell’s law relates the angle of incidence i and the angle of refraction r to the refractive indices of the two media. It is given by:
Snell's Law Formula:
\( n_1 \sin(i) = n_2 \sin(r) \)
where:
This equation can be derived using the principles of wave theory and the relationship between the speed of light in the two media. The refractive index n is defined as:
Refractive Index Formula:
\( n = \frac{c}{v} \)
where c is the speed of light in vacuum and v is the speed of light in the medium.
Thus, Snell’s law ensures that the ratio of the sine of the angles is equal to the ratio of the refractive indices.
The refraction of the plane wave can be described by Snell’s law, and the relationship between the angles of incidence and refraction in two media is given by:
Snell's Law:
\( n_1 \sin(i) = n_2 \sin(r) \)
The Anguish of the King
When the king Devanampiya Piyadassi had been ruling for eight years, the (country of the) Kalingas (present-day coastal Orissa) was conquered by (him). One hundred and fifty thousand men were deported, a hundred thousand were killed, and many more died.
After that, now that (the country of) the Kalingas has been taken, Devanampiya (is devoted) to an intense study of Dhamma, to the love of Dhamma, and to instructing (the people) in Dhamma.
This is the repentance of Devanampiya on account of his conquest of the (country of the) Kalingas.
For this is considered very painful and deplorable by Devanampiya that, while one is conquering an unconquered (country) slaughter, death and deportation of people (take place) there...
Declining a Royal Gift
This excerpt from a sufi text describes the proceedings at Shaikh Nizamuddin Auliya’s hospice in 1313 : I (the author, Amir Hasan Sijzi) had the good fortune of kissing his (Shaikh Nizamuddin Auliya’s) feet ... At this time a local ruler had sent him the deed of ownership to two gardens and much land, along with the provisions and tools for their maintenance. The ruler had also made it clear that he was relinquishing all his rights to both the gardens and land. The master ... had not accepted that gift. Instead, he had lamented: “What have I to do with gardens and fields and lands ? ... None of our ... spiritual masters had engaged in such activity.”
Then he told an appropriate story: “... Sultan Ghiyasuddin, who at that time was still known as Ulugh Khan, came to visit Shaikh Fariduddin (and) offered some money and ownership deeds for four villages to the Shaikh, the money being for the benefit of the dervishes (sufis), and the land for his use. Smiling, Shaikh al Islam (Fariduddin) said: ‘Give me the money. I will dispense it to the dervishes. But as for those land deeds, keep them. There are many who long for them. Give them away to such persons.’”
What taluqdars thought
The attitude of the taluqdars was best expressed by Hanwant Singh, the Raja of Kalakankar, near Rae Bareli. During the mutiny, Hanwant Singh had given shelter to a British officer, and conveyed him to safety. While taking leave of the officer, Hanwant Singh told him:
Sahib, your countrymen came into this country and drove out our King. You sent your officers round the districts to examine the titles to the estates. At one blow you took from me lands which from time immemorial had been in my family. I submitted. Suddenly misfortune fell upon you. The people of the land rose against you. You came to me whom you had despoiled. I have saved you. But now – now I march at the head of my retainers to Lucknow to try and drive you from the country.