To solve this problem, we need to understand the impact of computer system crashes on the completion time of the assignment.
Initially, the company plans to use \(m\) computer systems to complete the assignment in 17 days. With computer crashes occurring each day after the first, we know that:
The assignment actually took 8 more days longer than planned. Hence, the assignment was completed in \(17 + 8 = 25\) days.
We need to set up an equation to determine the initial number of systems \(m\).
Let’s calculate the total work in terms of "computer-days" required to complete the assignment without crashes:
The total work required is \(17m\) computer-days.
Now consider the reduction in computer-days due to crashes:
Therefore, the total work done over 25 days is:
\(m + (m - 4) + (m - 8) + \ldots + (m - 4 \times (d-1))\) where \(d\) is the day number, totaling 25.
The series \(m + (m - 4) + (m - 8) + \cdots\) can be simplified with an arithmetic series where:
The last term, \(l = m - 4 \times (25 - 1)\).
The sum of the first \(n\) terms of an arithmetic series is given by:
\(S_n = \frac{n}{2} \times (a + l)\)
Substitute in the values to set up the equation:
\(25m - 4 \times (0 + 1 + 2 + \cdots + 24) = 17m\)
The term \((0 + 1 + 2 + \cdots + 24)\) is a sum of the first 24 natural numbers:
\(\frac{24 \times (24 + 1)}{2} = 300\)
So the equation simplifies to:
\(25m - 4 \times 300 = 17m\)
Solving for \(m\) gives:
\(25m - 17m = 1200\)
\(8m = 1200\)
\(m = 150\)
Thus, the initial number of computer systems, \(m\), is 150.
\[ 17m = m + (m - 4) + (m - 4 \times 2) + \dots + (m - 4 \times 24) \]
\[ 17m = 25m - 4(1 + 2 + \dots + 24) \]
\[ 8m = 4 \times \frac{24 \times 25}{2} = 150 \]
Consider the following sequence of reactions : 
Molar mass of the product formed (A) is ______ g mol\(^{-1}\).
In a Young's double slit experiment, three polarizers are kept as shown in the figure. The transmission axes of \( P_1 \) and \( P_2 \) are orthogonal to each other. The polarizer \( P_3 \) covers both the slits with its transmission axis at \( 45^\circ \) to those of \( P_1 \) and \( P_2 \). An unpolarized light of wavelength \( \lambda \) and intensity \( I_0 \) is incident on \( P_1 \) and \( P_2 \). The intensity at a point after \( P_3 \), where the path difference between the light waves from \( S_1 \) and \( S_2 \) is \( \frac{\lambda}{3} \), is:
