Step 1: Consider a uniform surface charge density \( \sigma \) on both a conducting plate and a nonconducting sheet.
For a nonconducting sheet, the electric field at a point near the surface can be derived from Gauss's law.
Using a Gaussian pillbox with a small area \( A \) around the surface, we apply Gauss’s law:
Since the sheet is nonconducting, the charge is only on one side of the sheet.
The total enclosed charge is \( \sigma A \).
The electric flux through the pillbox is:
\[ E \cdot A + E \cdot A = \frac{\sigma A}{\epsilon_0} \] \[ 2E = \frac{\sigma}{\epsilon_0} \quad \Rightarrow \quad E = \frac{\sigma}{2 \epsilon_0} \] So, the electric field due to a nonconducting sheet with charge density \( \sigma \) is:
\[ E_{non-conducting}} = \frac{\sigma}{2 \epsilon_0} \] For a conducting plate, the situation is different because charges on a conductor move freely and spread out evenly. The field due to a conducting plate is calculated similarly using Gauss’s law. For a conducting plate, the charge distributes evenly on both sides of the plate, so the electric field is the sum of the fields from both sides. Each side contributes \( \frac{\sigma}{2 \epsilon_0} \), and thus the total electric field is:
\[ E_{conducting}} = \frac{\sigma}{\epsilon_0} \]
Step 2: We can now compare the electric fields for both cases:
For a nonconducting sheet, \( E_{non-conducting}} = \frac{\sigma}{2 \epsilon_0} \).
For a conducting plate, \( E_{conducting}} = \frac{\sigma}{\epsilon_0} \).
Therefore, the electric field for a conducting plate is twice that for a nonconducting sheet. \[ E_{conducting}} = 2 \cdot E_{non-conducting}} \] Thus, the electric field is twice in the case of a conducting plate compared to a nonconducting sheet.
The current passing through the battery in the given circuit, is:
A constant voltage of 50 V is maintained between the points A and B of the circuit shown in the figure. The current through the branch CD of the circuit is :
Manav and Namit were partners in a firm sharing profits and losses in the ratio of 3 : 2. Their Balance Sheet as at 31st March 2024 was as follows:
Liabilities | Assets | ||
---|---|---|---|
Capitals: | Machinery | ₹8,00,000 | |
Manav | ₹4,00,000 | Investments | ₹5,00,000 |
Namit | ₹6,00,000 | Debtors | ₹12,00,000 |
Bank Overdraft | ₹9,00,000 | Stock | ₹3,00,000 |
Creditors | ₹10,00,000 | Cash in Hand | ₹1,00,000 |
Total | ₹29,00,000 | Total | ₹29,00,000 |
The firm was dissolved on the above date and the following transactions took place:
[(i)] Stock was given to creditors in full settlement of their account.
[(ii)] Investments were taken over by Manav at 120% of book value.
[(iii)] Bad debts amounted to ₹ 2,00,000.
[(iv)] Machinery was realised at 50% discount.
[(v)] Realisation expenses amounted to ₹ 1,00,000 which were paid by Namit.
Prepare Realisation Account.