Question:

Should private operators be allowed to operate passenger train service in India?

Show Hint

When judging argument strength, focus on how directly the reason supports or opposes the main decision, and whether it addresses broader impacts rather than narrow or temporary issues.
Updated On: Aug 12, 2025
  • Argument I is strong
  • Argument II is strong
  • Both I and II are strong
  • Both I and II are weak
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is B

Solution and Explanation

Step 1: Understanding Argument I
Argument I states — "No, private operators do not agree to operate on non-profitable sectors."
While this is a practical concern, it focuses only on the reluctance of private operators and does not evaluate the overall benefits or disadvantages for the public.
Also, such reluctance can be addressed by government policy, subsidies, or cross-subsidization.
Therefore, although factually possible, it is not strong enough as a sole reason to reject the idea.
Step 2: Understanding Argument II
Argument II states — "Yes, it will improve the quality of Indian Railway Service."
This is a strong argument because competition generally drives better service quality, efficiency, and customer satisfaction.
Private participation can bring modern technology, better maintenance, improved cleanliness, and faster complaint redressal.
It can also reduce the financial burden on the government by sharing infrastructure costs.
Thus, the improvement in quality is a relevant and strong reason in favour of allowing private operators.
Step 3: Conclusion
Since Argument I is weak (limited scope and not conclusive) and Argument II is strong (direct, relevant, and supported by economic logic), the correct choice is option (b).
\[ \boxed{\text{Correct Option: (b) Argument II is strong}} \]
Was this answer helpful?
0
0

Questions Asked in CLAT exam

View More Questions