To determine the author's intention from the passage, we need to analyze the core message presented by the author, J. Krishnamurti. The passage discusses the nature of effective education and the role of love, care, and understanding in nurturing a child.
The author emphasizes that true education involves understanding a child as they are, rather than imposing our ideals upon them. He argues that enforcing ideals leads to conformity, fear, and conflict. Instead, love is emphasized as crucial; education without love leads to an inability to address human problems. Krishnamurti suggests that a teacher should not rely on fixed methodologies, but study each student individually.
The options provided are:
The right kind of education for a child cannot be without love, care and understanding |
True education should be governed by a tendency to conform a child to our ideals |
The teacher should focus on how a child should be according to his/her methodology, hope, or expectation |
Parents and teachers should work together collectively to guide a child on what she/he should do as per their ambitions |
After evaluating these options with respect to the passage content:
Thus, the option reflecting the author's intention is the first one: The right kind of education for a child cannot be without love, care and understanding.
The passage emphasizes the importance of understanding children as they are, rather than imposing external ideals upon them. The author's primary intention is to highlight the necessity of love, care, and understanding in education. Here is the breakdown:
Based on these points, the correct option is:
The comprehension passage emphasizes the need for a teacher to genuinely understand each student individually rather than imposing an ideal of what they should be. The author argues that a right kind of teacher will not rely solely on systematic methods or ideals, which can lead to conformity, fear, and internal conflict. Instead, the focus should be on understanding the child's unique tendencies, moods, and peculiarities through love and observation. The author criticizes the pursuit of ideals as being more about fulfilling our ambitions than caring for the child's actual needs. Teachers, therefore, should cultivate patience, understanding, and love, allowing them to adapt their approach to each student's individual characteristics.
This directly aligns with the correct answer: "They should focus on studying each student individually."
The passage elucidates the nature of children and the dynamics involved in providing the right education. It articulates that children are "impressionable, volatile, sensitive, afraid, affectionate," and to effectively educate them requires understanding, patience, and love. When educators or parents lack these qualities, they resort to quick fixes and hope for automatic, miraculous results. The passage criticizes the imposition of ideals on children, suggesting that it is a lack of genuine love and understanding that leads to seeking such expedient solutions. Therefore, the answer to why we look for quick and easy remedies and expect marvellous, automatic outcomes is because "children are impressionable, volatile, sensitive, and affectionate." This characteristic makes dealing with them complex and challenging, making people lean towards simpler, immediate solutions when the necessary understanding and patience are absent.
The word "volatile" refers to something that is unstable, unpredictable, or liable to change suddenly. To find its antonym, we look for words that convey stability, reliability, and constancy. The options given, "Stable", "Steady", and "Constant", all fit these criteria as they represent the opposite of volatility: enduring, consistent, and firm. Hence, they are all antonyms of "volatile".
In the comprehension passage, the context emphasizes the need for understanding children who are described as "volatile" among other traits. It suggests that dealing with children requires understanding, patience, and love instead of quick fixes. This further supports why sensitivity and stability are essential attributes, aligning with the concept of opposing volatility.
As of 2009, there are 890 World Heritage Sites that are located in 148 countries (map). 689 of these sites are cultural and include places like the Sydney Opera House in Australia and the Historic Center of Vienna in Austria. 176 are natural and feature such locations as the U.S.’s Yellowstone and Grand Canyon National Parks. 25 of the World Heritage Sites are considered mixed i.e. natural and cultural Peru’s Machu Picchu is one of these. Italy has the highest number of World Heritage Sites with 44. India has 36 (28 cultural, 7 natural and 1 mixed) World Heritage Sites. The World Heritage Committee has divided the world’s countries into five geographic zones which include (1) Africa, (2) Arab States, (3) Asia Pacific (including Australia and Oceania), (4) Europe and North America and (5) Latin America and the Caribbean.
WORLD HERITAGE SITES IN DANGER
Like many natural, historic and cultural sites around the world, many World Heritage Sites are in danger of being destroyed or lost due to war, poaching, natural disasters like earthquakes, uncontrolled urbanization, heavy tourist traffic and environmental factors like air pollution and acid rain.