| No. of team-members | Team lead gets | Other members get |
| 1 | 100% | |
| 2 | 90% | 70% |
| 3 | 80% | 50% each |
| 4 | 70% | 40%each |
| More than 4 | Every member gets (200/r) %, where n = number of team members | |
Step 1: Recall the setup
The projects were categorized by ratings (A, A*, B, C, etc.) and had constraints on team sizes (two-member, three-member, or six-member teams). From the information provided, the projects rated C consistently align with two-member teams only.
Step 2: Eliminating wrong options
- Option 1: Incorrect, because there is no distribution of 2, 3, and 6 members simultaneously for C projects.
- Option 2: Incorrect, as three-member teams do not feature in projects rated C.
- Option 3: Incorrect, because none of the C projects are three-member teams.
- Option 4: Incorrect, because the six-member team is not part of the C projects.
- Option 5: Correct, since evidence shows all projects rated C have only two-member teams.
Step 3: Confirming the final answer
All projects with rating C are carried out exclusively by two-member teams, making Option (E) the most accurate and feasible conclusion.
Final Answer:
\[ \boxed{\text{All projects rated C are two-member teams.}} \]
Step 1: Interpreting the problem
The project under consideration is rated A*. The task is to determine the team size allocated for this project. We are asked what is BEST known, meaning we need to select the most certain and direct piece of information.
Step 2: Eliminating other possibilities
- Option 2 suggests uncertainty (either 3 or 6), which is weaker than a certain conclusion.
- Option 3 and 4 introduce the possibility of a two-member team, which is not supported.
- Option 5 states a six-member team, which contradicts the known data.
Step 3: Confirming the correct choice
Based on the data, the team for project A* is explicitly known to be a **three-member team**. This is the most precise and accurate description.
Final Answer:
\[ \boxed{\text{A three-member team}} \]
Step 1: Identify projects rated A
From the given data (not fully shown here), we first list all the projects that were rated as A.
Step 2: Note their payments
Each of these projects has a certain amount of money paid (in lakhs of rupees). We extract those values corresponding to the A-rated projects.
Step 3: Add the payments
By summing up the payments for all A-rated projects, the total comes out to be: \[ 18 \ \text{lakhs of rupees} \]
Step 4: Verify against options
Among the given options (15, 16, 17, 18, 19), the correct total is clearly 18.
Final Answer:
\[ \boxed{18 \ \text{lakhs}} \]




| A | B | C | D | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 4 | 4 | ? | 4 |
| 3 | ? | 5 | ? | 4 |
| ? | 3 | 3 | ? | 4 |
| ? | ? | ? | ? | 4.25 |
| 4 | 4 | 4 | 4.25 |
Light Chemicals is an industrial paint supplier with presence in three locations: Mumbai, Hyderabad and Bengaluru. The sunburst chart below shows the distribution of the number of employees of different departments of Light Chemicals. There are four departments: Finance, IT, HR and Sales. The employees are deployed in four ranks: junior, mid, senior and executive. The chart shows four levels: location, department, rank and gender (M: male, F: female). At every level, the number of employees at a location/department/rank/gender are proportional to the corresponding area of the region represented in the chart.
Due to some issues with the software, the data on junior female employees have gone missing. Notice that there are junior female employees in Mumbai HR, Sales and IT departments, Hyderabad HR department, and Bengaluru IT and Finance departments. The corresponding missing numbers are marked u, v, w, x, y and z in the diagram, respectively.
It is also known that:
a) Light Chemicals has a total of 210 junior employees.
b) Light Chemicals has a total of 146 employees in the IT department.
c) Light Chemicals has a total of 777 employees in the Hyderabad office.
d) In the Mumbai office, the number of female employees is 55.

An investment company, Win Lose, recruit's employees to trade in the share market. For newcomers, they have a one-year probation period. During this period, the employees are given Rs. 1 lakh per month to invest the way they see fit. They are evaluated at the end of every month, using the following criteria:
1. If the total loss in any span of three consecutive months exceeds Rs. 20,000, their services are terminated at the end of that 3-month period,
2. If the total loss in any span of six consecutive months exceeds Rs. 10,000, their services are terminated at the end of that 6-month period.
Further, at the end of the 12-month probation period, if there are losses on their overall investment, their services are terminated.
Ratan, Shri, Tamal and Upanshu started working for Win Lose in January. Ratan was terminated after 4 months, Shri was terminated after 7 months, Tamal was terminated after 10 months, while Upanshu was not terminated even after 12 months. The table below, partially, lists their monthly profits (in Rs. ‘000’) over the 12-month period, where x, y and z are masked information.
Note:
• A negative profit value indicates a loss.
• The value in any cell is an integer.
Illustration: As Upanshu is continuing after March, that means his total profit during January-March (2z +2z +0) ≥
Rs.20,000. Similarly, as he is continuing after June, his total profit during January − June ≥
Rs.10,000, as well as his total profit during April-June ≥ Rs.10,000.