In the given complexes:
Let's analyze each complex:
\([Cr(CO)_6]:\) Chromium is in the +2 oxidation state, and it has d6 electron configuration. It can exhibit synergic bonding due to back-bonding.
\([Mn(CO)_5]:\) Manganese is in the +1 oxidation state, and it has d7 electron configuration. It can exhibit synergic bonding due to back-bonding.
\([Mn_2(CO)_{10}]:\) Manganese is in the +1 oxidation state here as well. The molecule contains a manganese-manganese bond, and each manganese can exhibit synergic bonding with the surrounding CO ligands.
All three complexes are likely to exhibit synergic bonding. CO ligand shows synergic bonding, so all complexes can show synergic bonding.
Therefore, the number of complexes that will exhibit synergic bonding is 3.
In the following species, how many species have the same magnetic moment?
(i) Cr\(^{2+}\)
(ii) Mn\(^{3+}\)
(iii) Ni\(^{2+}\)
(iv) Sc\(^{2+}\)
(v) Zn\(^{2+}\)
(vi) V\(^{3+}\)
(vii) Ti\(^{4+}\)
Let \( A = \{-3, -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, 3\} \). A relation \( R \) is defined such that \( xRy \) if \( y = \max(x, 1) \). The number of elements required to make it reflexive is \( l \), the number of elements required to make it symmetric is \( m \), and the number of elements in the relation \( R \) is \( n \). Then the value of \( l + m + n \) is equal to:
For hydrogen-like species, which of the following graphs provides the most appropriate representation of \( E \) vs \( Z \) plot for a constant \( n \)?
[E : Energy of the stationary state, Z : atomic number, n = principal quantum number]
The number of 6-letter words, with or without meaning, that can be formed using the letters of the word MATHS such that any letter that appears in the word must appear at least twice, is $ 4 \_\_\_\_\_$.
The metal-carbon bond possesses both the σ and π character in a metal carbonyl. The synergic effect produced by the metal-ligand bond strengthens the bond between the carbonyl molecule and the metal. The types of bonding that exist in metal carbonyls are as follows:
They are found to dissociate in various solutions. The stability of a coordination compound in a solution mainly depends on the degree of association between the two species involved in the state of equilibrium. For the formation of the compound quantitatively the stability of any complex is given by the magnitude of the equilibrium constant. For instance,
A + 4B→ AB4