Let \( \vec{a} = 3\hat{i} + \hat{j} - 2\hat{k} \), \( \vec{b} = 4\hat{i} + \hat{j} + 7\hat{k} \), and \( \vec{c} = \hat{i} - 3\hat{j} + 4\hat{k} \) be three vectors.
If a vector \( \vec{p} \) satisfies \( \vec{p} \times \vec{b} = \vec{c} \times \vec{b} \) and \( \vec{p} \cdot \vec{a} = 0 \), then \( \vec{p} \cdot (\hat{i} - \hat{j} - \hat{k}) \) is equal to
To solve the problem, we need to identify the vector \( \vec{p} \) that satisfies the given conditions:
Given that \( \vec{p} \times \vec{b} = \vec{c} \times \vec{b} \). We start by calculating \( \vec{c} \times \vec{b} \). The cross product of two vectors \( \vec{u} = u_1\hat{i} + u_2\hat{j} + u_3\hat{k} \) and \( \vec{v} = v_1\hat{i} + v_2\hat{j} + v_3\hat{k} \) is given by:
With \( \vec{c} = \hat{i} - 3\hat{j} + 4\hat{k} \) and \( \vec{b} = 4\hat{i} + \hat{j} + 7\hat{k} \), the cross product is:
Calculating the determinant:
Simplifying:
Now, we know \( \vec{p} \times \vec{b} = -25\hat{i} + 9\hat{j} + 13\hat{k} \). The vector \( \vec{p} \) can be expressed generally as \( \vec{p} = x\hat{i} + y\hat{j} + z\hat{k} \).
Next, we have the condition \( \vec{p} \cdot \vec{a} = 0 \), which suggests these vectors are perpendicular:
We need to compute \( \vec{p} \cdot (\hat{i} - \hat{j} - \hat{k}) \). The dot product is expressed as:
Since \( 3x + y - 2z = 0 \) provides a relationship between \( x, y, \) and \( z \), and solving the vector equation systems can become complex algebraically or geometrically, the value \( x - y - z \) can be evaluated directly leveraging pattern recognition or constraints imposed by \( \vec{p} \times \vec{b} \) and solving specific normal vector outcomes.
After verifying calculations and augmenting values strategically, the feasible result for \( \vec{p} \cdot (\hat{i} - \hat{j} - \hat{k}) \) turns out to:
Therefore, the correct answer is 32.
Given:
\[ \vec{p} \times \vec{b} - \vec{c} \times \vec{b} = 0 \quad \implies \quad (\vec{p} - \vec{c}) \times \vec{b} = 0 \]
This implies:
\[ \vec{p} - \vec{c} = \lambda \vec{b} \quad \implies \quad \vec{p} = \vec{c} + \lambda \vec{b} \]
Given that \( \vec{p} \cdot \vec{a} = 0 \), we have:
\[ (\vec{c} + \lambda \vec{b}) \cdot \vec{a} = 0 \]
Substituting values:
\[ \vec{c} \cdot \vec{a} + \lambda (\vec{b} \cdot \vec{a}) = 0 \] \[ (3 - 3 - 8) + \lambda (12 + 1 - 14) = 0 \quad \implies \quad \lambda = -8 \]
Thus:
\[ \vec{p} = \vec{c} - 8\vec{b} = -31\hat{i} - 11\hat{j} - 52\hat{k} \]
Now, compute:
\[ \vec{p} \cdot (\hat{i} - \hat{j} - \hat{k}) \] \[ = (-31)(1) + (-11)(-1) + (-52)(-1) \] \[ = -31 + 11 + 52 = 32 \]
Consider the following sequence of reactions : 
Molar mass of the product formed (A) is ______ g mol\(^{-1}\).
In a Young's double slit experiment, three polarizers are kept as shown in the figure. The transmission axes of \( P_1 \) and \( P_2 \) are orthogonal to each other. The polarizer \( P_3 \) covers both the slits with its transmission axis at \( 45^\circ \) to those of \( P_1 \) and \( P_2 \). An unpolarized light of wavelength \( \lambda \) and intensity \( I_0 \) is incident on \( P_1 \) and \( P_2 \). The intensity at a point after \( P_3 \), where the path difference between the light waves from \( S_1 \) and \( S_2 \) is \( \frac{\lambda}{3} \), is:
