Given the equation:
\[ (2a) \ln a = (bc) \ln b, \quad 2a > 0, \quad bc > 0 \]
Rewriting the equation:
\[ \ln a (\ln 2 + \ln a) = \ln b (\ln b + \ln c) \]
Let:
The equations become:
From \( \alpha y = xz \), we get:
\[ \alpha = \frac{xz}{y} \]
Substituting into the second equation:
\[ x^2 (z + y) = y^2 (y + z) \]
Factorizing gives:
\[ (y + z)(x^2 - y^2) = 0 \]
This implies either:
If \( bc = 1 \), then:
\[ (2a) \ln a = 1 \]
Solving for \( a \):
\[ a = 1 \quad \text{or} \quad a = \frac{1}{2} \]
For \( a = 1 \), the solution is:
\[ (a, b, c) = \left( \frac{1}{2}, \lambda, \frac{1}{\lambda} \right), \quad \lambda = 1, 2, \frac{1}{2} \]
If \( ab = 1 \), then the solutions are:
\[ (a, b, c) = \left( \lambda, \frac{1}{\lambda}, \frac{1}{2} \right), \quad \lambda = 1, 2, \frac{1}{2} \]
For the given conditions, summing \( 6a + 5bc \):
\[ 6a + 5bc = 3 + 5 = 8 \]
\[ \boxed{8} \]
Directions: In Question Numbers 19 and 20, a statement of Assertion (A) is followed by a statement of Reason (R).
Choose the correct option from the following:
(A) Both Assertion (A) and Reason (R) are true and Reason (R) is the correct explanation of Assertion (A).
(B) Both Assertion (A) and Reason (R) are true, but Reason (R) is not the correct explanation of Assertion (A).
(C) Assertion (A) is true, but Reason (R) is false.
(D) Assertion (A) is false, but Reason (R) is true.
Assertion (A): For any two prime numbers $p$ and $q$, their HCF is 1 and LCM is $p + q$.
Reason (R): For any two natural numbers, HCF × LCM = product of numbers.