The question involves evaluating the relationship between the assertion and reason provided, both of which pertain to periodic trends in the covalent radius of elements down a group in the periodic table. To answer this, we need to examine the concepts involved.
Thus, the correct response is that while both statements are true, the reason does not adequately explain the assertion.
Step 1. Analyze the Assertion (A): The increase in covalent radius from N to P is significant due to additional electron shells. However, from A to B, the increase in size is smaller because of the presence of poor shielding by d- and f-electrons.
Step 2. Analyze the Reason (R): The statement in (R) is generally true as covalent and ionic radii tend to increase down the group in the periodic table. However, this reason does not specifically explain the smaller increase observed from A to B.
Step 3. Conclusion: Although both statements are individually true, the reason provided does not correctly explain the observed trend in covalent radii from A to B.

The correct sequence of reagents for the above conversion of X to Y is :
Match List-I with List-II 
Choose the correct answer from the options given below:
In the given figure, the blocks $A$, $B$ and $C$ weigh $4\,\text{kg}$, $6\,\text{kg}$ and $8\,\text{kg}$ respectively. The coefficient of sliding friction between any two surfaces is $0.5$. The force $\vec{F}$ required to slide the block $C$ with constant speed is ___ N.
(Given: $g = 10\,\text{m s}^{-2}$) 
The equivalent resistance between the points \(A\) and \(B\) in the given circuit is \[ \frac{x}{5}\,\Omega. \] Find the value of \(x\). 