Question

Direction: Read the following scenario and answer the questions that follow.
Rahul is the CEO of a multinational corporation that operates in a country where discrimination based on caste is prevalent. Rahul has been urged by stakeholders to address the underrepresentation of individuals from marginalised castes in the company's workforce. However, Rahul is hesitant and unsure about the benefits and feasibility of actively promoting diversity in this regard.
The following arguments are presented to Rahul about the benefits of hiring individuals from lower castes:
1) Individuals from marginalised castes bring diverse perspectives, experiences, and cultural insights, which can foster innovation and creativity within the organisation.
2) Hiring individuals from marginalised castes can help reduce societal inequalities by providing them with opportunities for economic mobility and social upward mobility.
3) Creating an inclusive work environment that promotes diversity can attract top talent from all backgrounds, leading to a more competitive and successful organisation.
4) Individuals from marginalised castes often possess resilience, determination, and a strong work ethic due to the challenges they have faced, making them valuable assets to the company.
5) Promoting diversity and social inclusion can improve the company's reputation, enhance brand image, and attract a wider customer base.
From the above arguments, which of the following options indicate that Rahul's apprehensions are misplaced?

• A. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
• B. 1, 3, 4
• C. 1, 2, 3, 4
• D. 2, 4, 5
• E. 1, 4, 5

Answer 1

The Correct Option is A

Argument 1 highlights the importance of diverse perspectives, experiences, and cultural insights that individuals from marginalised castes can bring to the organisation. By fostering innovation and creativity, they can contribute to the company's success.

Argument 2 emphasises the social impact of providing opportunities for economic and social upward mobility to individuals from marginalised castes. By hiring them, the company can contribute to reducing societal inequalities and promoting social inclusion.

Argument 3 focuses on the competitive advantage of creating an inclusive work environment that promotes diversity. By attracting top talent from all backgrounds, the company can enhance its competitiveness and success.

Argument 4 highlights the valuable qualities that individuals from marginalised castes often possess, such as resilience, determination, and a strong work ethic. These qualities can be beneficial to the company and contribute to its growth and performance.

Argument 5 emphasises that promoting diversity and social inclusion can improve the company's reputation, enhance brand image, and attract a wider customer base.

Hence, all of them will show the CEO that their concerns are misplaced.