Argument 1 highlights the importance of diverse perspectives, experiences, and cultural insights that individuals from marginalised castes can bring to the organisation. By fostering innovation and creativity, they can contribute to the company's success.
Argument 2 emphasises the social impact of providing opportunities for economic and social upward mobility to individuals from marginalised castes. By hiring them, the company can contribute to reducing societal inequalities and promoting social inclusion.
Argument 3 focuses on the competitive advantage of creating an inclusive work environment that promotes diversity. By attracting top talent from all backgrounds, the company can enhance its competitiveness and success.
Argument 4 highlights the valuable qualities that individuals from marginalised castes often possess, such as resilience, determination, and a strong work ethic. These qualities can be beneficial to the company and contribute to its growth and performance.
Argument 5 emphasises that promoting diversity and social inclusion can improve the company's reputation, enhance brand image, and attract a wider customer base.
Hence, all of them will show the CEO that their concerns are misplaced.
A | B | C | D | Average |
---|---|---|---|---|
3 | 4 | 4 | ? | 4 |
3 | ? | 5 | ? | 4 |
? | 3 | 3 | ? | 4 |
? | ? | ? | ? | 4.25 |
4 | 4 | 4 | 4.25 |