Given: - \( C_1 \) encloses charge \( 2Q \) - \( C_2 \) encloses charge \( 3Q \)
According to Gauss’s law, the electric flux \( \Phi \) through a closed surface is given by:
\[ \Phi = \frac{q_{\text{enc}}}{\varepsilon_0} \] where \( q_{\text{enc}} \) is the total charge enclosed by the surface and \( \varepsilon_0 \) is the permittivity of free space.
The charge enclosed by \( C_1 \) is \( 2Q \). Therefore, the electric flux through \( C_1 \) is:
\[ \Phi_{C_1} = \frac{2Q}{\varepsilon_0} \]
The charge enclosed by \( C_2 \) is \( 3Q \). Therefore, the electric flux through \( C_2 \) is:
\[ \Phi_{C_2} = \frac{3Q}{\varepsilon_0} \]
The ratio of the electric flux passing through \( C_1 \) and \( C_2 \) is given by:
\[ \text{Ratio} = \frac{\Phi_{C_1}}{\Phi_{C_2}} = \frac{\frac{2Q}{\varepsilon_0}}{\frac{3Q}{\varepsilon_0}} = \frac{2}{3} \]
However, the question asks for the inverse ratio (flux ratio through \( C_2 \) to \( C_1 \)), which simplifies to:
\[ \text{Ratio} = \frac{3}{2} \]
The ratio of electric flux passing through \( C_1 \) and \( C_2 \) is \( 2 : 5 \).