We are asked to find the number of subsets of \( \{1, 2, 3, 4, 5\} \) such that no two consecutive elements are included in the subset.
Step 1: Analyzing the problem
This problem can be solved using a recurrence relation. We define \( a_n \) as the number of valid subsets of \( \{1, 2, \ldots, n\} \) where no two consecutive elements are selected.
Step 2: Recurrence Relation
The recurrence relation can be described as follows: If \( n \) is not included in the subset, then we are simply choosing a subset from \( \{1, 2, \ldots, n-1\} \), which can be done in \( a_{n-1} \) ways.
If \( n \) is included in the subset, then \( n-1 \) cannot be included, and we are choosing a subset from \( \{1, 2, \ldots, n-2\} \), which can be done in \( a_{n-2} \) ways.
Thus, the recurrence relation is: \[ a_n = a_{n-1} + a_{n-2}. \]
Step 3: Base Cases
We need the base cases: \( a_2 = 3 \), because the subsets of \( \{1, 2\} \) with no consecutive numbers are \( \emptyset, \{1\}, \{2\} \). \( a_3 = 4 \), because the subsets of \( \{1, 2, 3\} \) with no consecutive numbers are \( \emptyset, \{1\}, \{2\}, \{1, 3\} \).
Step 4: Calculate \( a_5 \)
Now, we can use the recurrence relation to calculate \( a_5 \): \[ a_4 = a_3 + a_2 = 4 + 3 = 7, \] \[ a_5 = a_4 + a_3 = 7 + 4 = 13. \]
Thus, the number of subsets of \( \{1, 2, 3, 4, 5\} \) with no two consecutive elements is: \[ n(S_5) = 13. \]
Given set: \[ A = \{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, \ldots, n\} \] The number of subsets having \(r\) elements such that no two elements are consecutive is given by: \[ {}^{n - r + 1}C_r \] For \(n = 5\), \[ \text{No. of ways} = {}^{6 - r}C_r \] Subsets having no element: \[ 1 \text{ way} \] Subsets having exactly 1 element: \[ {}^5C_1 = 5 \] Subsets having exactly 2 elements: \[ {}^4C_2 = 6 \] Subsets having exactly 3 elements: \[ {}^3C_3 = 1 \] Therefore, \[ 5 + 6 + 1 + 1 = 13 \] \[ \boxed{\text{Total number of subsets = 13}} \]
Consider the following sequence of reactions : 
Molar mass of the product formed (A) is ______ g mol\(^{-1}\).

In the first configuration (1) as shown in the figure, four identical charges \( q_0 \) are kept at the corners A, B, C and D of square of side length \( a \). In the second configuration (2), the same charges are shifted to mid points C, E, H, and F of the square. If \( K = \frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon_0} \), the difference between the potential energies of configuration (2) and (1) is given by: