Step 1: Compute the determinant of matrix \( A \).
\[ |A| = \begin{vmatrix} 1 & \cos \theta & 1 \\ -\cos \theta & 1 & \cos \theta \\ -1 & -\cos \theta & 1 \end{vmatrix}. \]
Using cofactor expansion along the first row:
\[ |A| = 1 \cdot \begin{vmatrix} 1 & \cos \theta \\ -\cos \theta & 1 \end{vmatrix} - \cos \theta \cdot \begin{vmatrix} -\cos \theta & \cos \theta \\ -1 & 1 \end{vmatrix} + 1 \cdot \begin{vmatrix} -\cos \theta & 1 \\ -1 & -\cos \theta \end{vmatrix}. \]
1. Compute the first minor:
\[ \begin{vmatrix} 1 & \cos \theta \\ -\cos \theta & 1 \end{vmatrix} = (1)(1) - (-\cos \theta)(\cos \theta) = 1 + \cos^2 \theta. \]
2. Compute the second minor:
\[ \begin{vmatrix} -\cos \theta & \cos \theta \\ -1 & 1 \end{vmatrix} = (-\cos \theta)(1) - (\cos \theta)(-1) = -\cos \theta + \cos \theta = 0. \]
3. Compute the third minor:
\[ \begin{vmatrix} -\cos \theta & 1 \\ -1 & -\cos \theta \end{vmatrix} = (-\cos \theta)(-\cos \theta) - (1)(-1) = \cos^2 \theta + 1. \]
Substitute back into the determinant:
\[ |A| = 1 \cdot (1 + \cos^2 \theta) - \cos \theta \cdot 0 + 1 \cdot (1 + \cos^2 \theta). \]
Simplify:
\[ |A| = (1 + \cos^2 \theta) + (1 + \cos^2 \theta) = 2 + 2\cos^2 \theta. \]
Step 2: Determine the range of \(|A| \).
Since \(\cos \theta \in [-1, 1]\), we have:
\[ \cos^2 \theta \in [0, 1]. \]
Thus:
\[ |A| = 2 + 2\cos^2 \theta \in [2, 4]. \]
Verification of Assertion (A): The determinant \(|A|\) lies in the interval \([2, 4]\), so the assertion is true.
Verification of Reason (R): The cosine function satisfies \(\cos \theta \in [-1, 1]\) for all \(\theta \in [0, 2\pi]\), so the reason is also true.
Conclusion: Both Assertion (A) and Reason (R) are true, and the Reason (R) correctly explains the Assertion (A).
If \(\begin{vmatrix} 2x & 3 \\ x & -8 \\ \end{vmatrix} = 0\), then the value of \(x\) is:
Rupal, Shanu and Trisha were partners in a firm sharing profits and losses in the ratio of 4:3:1. Their Balance Sheet as at 31st March, 2024 was as follows:
(i) Trisha's share of profit was entirely taken by Shanu.
(ii) Fixed assets were found to be undervalued by Rs 2,40,000.
(iii) Stock was revalued at Rs 2,00,000.
(iv) Goodwill of the firm was valued at Rs 8,00,000 on Trisha's retirement.
(v) The total capital of the new firm was fixed at Rs 16,00,000 which was adjusted according to the new profit sharing ratio of the partners. For this necessary cash was paid off or brought in by the partners as the case may be.
Prepare Revaluation Account and Partners' Capital Accounts.
On the basis of the following hypothetical data, calculate the percentage change in Real Gross Domestic Product (GDP) in the year 2022 – 23, using 2020 – 21 as the base year.
Year | Nominal GDP | Nominal GDP (Adjusted to Base Year Price) |
2020–21 | 3,000 | 5,000 |
2022–23 | 4,000 | 6,000 |