
The question involves understanding how the molar conductivity of a weak electrolyte changes when the volume of its solution is doubled by adding water.
Molar conductivity (\(Λ_m\)) is defined as:
\(Λ_m = \frac{κ}{C}\)
where \(κ\) is the conductivity of the solution and \(C\) is the concentration of the electrolyte.
When the volume of the solution is doubled, the concentration \((C)\) of the electrolyte is halved, as concentration is inversely proportional to volume.
However, since the solution is infinitely dilute, the impact on conductivity \((κ)\) is negligible. This is because at infinite dilution, the ions are completely dissociated and do not experience additional interactions.
Given this understanding, the molar conductivity for weak electrolytes does not change significantly with dilution at infinite dilution.
Therefore, the correct answer is: remain same or can not be measured accurately.
The measurement accuracy is also an issue due to the limitations of measuring extremely low conductance values at high dilutions.
The solution is already infinitely dilute, meaning the molar conductivity is at its maximum value. Adding more water will not dilute the solution further; therefore, there will be no change in molar conductivity. It will remain the same.
\[\text{Molar conductivity } (\Lambda_m) \propto \frac{\kappa}{c}\]
where $\kappa$ is the conductivity and $c$ is the concentration. For infinitely dilute solutions, $c$ is already approaching zero, and $\Lambda_m$ becomes constant.
Electricity is passed through an acidic solution of Cu$^{2+}$ till all the Cu$^{2+}$ was exhausted, leading to the deposition of 300 mg of Cu metal. However, a current of 600 mA was continued to pass through the same solution for another 28 minutes by keeping the total volume of the solution fixed at 200 mL. The total volume of oxygen evolved at STP during the entire process is ___ mL. (Nearest integer)
Given:
$\mathrm{Cu^{2+} + 2e^- \rightarrow Cu(s)}$
$\mathrm{O_2 + 4H^+ + 4e^- \rightarrow 2H_2O}$
Faraday constant = 96500 C mol$^{-1}$
Molar volume at STP = 22.4 L


Let the lines $L_1 : \vec r = \hat i + 2\hat j + 3\hat k + \lambda(2\hat i + 3\hat j + 4\hat k)$, $\lambda \in \mathbb{R}$ and $L_2 : \vec r = (4\hat i + \hat j) + \mu(5\hat i + + 2\hat j + \hat k)$, $\mu \in \mathbb{R}$ intersect at the point $R$. Let $P$ and $Q$ be the points lying on lines $L_1$ and $L_2$, respectively, such that $|PR|=\sqrt{29}$ and $|PQ|=\sqrt{\frac{47}{3}}$. If the point $P$ lies in the first octant, then $27(QR)^2$ is equal to}
Which one of the following graphs accurately represents the plot of partial pressure of CS₂ vs its mole fraction in a mixture of acetone and CS₂ at constant temperature?
