Why phenol does not undergo protonation readily?
Phenol does not undergo protonation readily because the lone pair of electrons on the oxygen of the hydroxyl group is delocalized into the benzene ring through resonance. This resonance effect plays a crucial role in making phenol less basic compared to alcohols.
In phenol, the lone pair of electrons on the oxygen atom of the hydroxyl group (\( -OH \)) is delocalized into the benzene ring. This means that the oxygen atom's electron density is partially transferred into the aromatic system, creating resonance structures like: \[ \text{C}_6\text{H}_5\text{O} \rightleftharpoons \text{C}_6\text{H}_5\text{O}^- \] The delocalization of the lone pair reduces the electron density on the oxygen atom, making it less available to accept a proton (\( \text{H}^+ \)).
Due to this delocalization, the oxygen in phenol is less basic than the oxygen in alcohols, where the lone pair on the oxygen atom is not involved in resonance with the benzene ring. In alcohols, the lone pair on the oxygen is more available to accept a proton, making alcohols more basic than phenol.
The lower electron density on the oxygen in phenol makes it less likely to attract a proton (\( \text{H}^+ \)) and undergo protonation. In contrast, alcohols, where the lone pair on the oxygen is more readily available, can easily undergo protonation.
Phenol does not undergo protonation readily because the electron density on the oxygen is reduced due to the resonance with the benzene ring, making the oxygen less basic than in alcohols.
Amides are less basic than amines.
Which is the correct order of acid strength from the following?

Rishika and Shivika were partners in a firm sharing profits and losses in the ratio of 3 : 2. Their Balance Sheet as at 31st March, 2024 stood as follows:
Balance Sheet of Rishika and Shivika as at 31st March, 2024
| Liabilities | Amount (₹) | Assets | Amount (₹) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capitals: | Equipment | 45,00,000 | |
| Rishika – ₹30,00,000 Shivika – ₹20,00,000 | 50,00,000 | Investments | 5,00,000 |
| Shivika’s Husband’s Loan | 5,00,000 | Debtors | 35,00,000 |
| Creditors | 40,00,000 | Stock | 8,00,000 |
| Cash at Bank | 2,00,000 | ||
| Total | 95,00,000 | Total | 95,00,000 |
The firm was dissolved on the above date and the following transactions took place:
(i) Equipements were given to creditors in full settlement of their account.
(ii) Investments were sold at a profit of 20% on its book value.
(iii) Full amount was collected from debtors.
(iv) Stock was taken over by Rishika at 50% discount.
(v) Actual expenses of realisation amounted to ₹ 2,00,000 which were paid by the firm. Prepare Realisation Account.