The viewpoint regarding the origin and need for clothing, associated with taboo as well as the desire for personal adornment, is typically discussed by anthropologists.
Anthropologists study human societies, cultures, and their development. They have explored the role of clothing not only for practical purposes (such as protection from the environment) but also in terms of cultural significance, social status, and taboos. Clothing is often seen as a cultural symbol, and the desire for adornment and expression is considered an important aspect of human development.
Let’s look at why the other options are less relevant:
(1) Psychologists: Psychologists study human behavior and mental processes, and while they may explore clothing in terms of individual identity or self-expression, the focus on taboo and cultural adornment is more rooted in anthropology.
(2) Ethnologists: Ethnologists are a subset of anthropologists, focusing specifically on the study of cultures and communities. While they also study cultural practices like clothing, the broader framework and theories are provided by anthropologists as a whole.
(3) Economists: Economists would focus on the economic aspects of clothing (such as production, consumption, and trade) rather than its cultural or taboo significance.
Thus, the correct answer is (4) Anthropologists.
Anthropologists study human societies, cultures, and their development, associating clothing origin with taboos and personal adornment.
List-I (Identification Mark) | List-II (Identification Type) |
---|---|
(A) Restrictive sumptuary laws | (I) Identification of profession |
(B) Wedding band on ring finger | (II) Identification of marital status |
(C) Robes and wigs of judges | (III) Identification of individual status in a tribe |
(D) Special clothes, mask, and carrier accessories | (IV) Identification of social status |