Question:

Which pair of ions among the following can be separated by precipitation method?

Show Hint

Using a simple frame or just bolding for the box Key Points:
Precipitation separation relies on solubility differences. Large solubility differences often exist between ions of different charges (oxidation states), e.g., Ln(II) vs Ln(III).
Ln(II) sulfates (like EuSO$_4$, YbSO$_4$) are often less soluble than Ln(III) sulfates.
Ln(III) ions adjacent in the series (like Gd$^{3+$, Dy$^{3+$) have very similar properties and are hard to separate by precipitation.
Stability of oxidation states is crucial: Eu$^{2+$ and Yb$^{2+$ are relatively stable; Gd$^{2+$ is not.
Updated On: Apr 29, 2025
  • Eu(II) and Dy(III)
  • Gd(III) and Dy(III)
  • Eu(II) and Yb(II)
  • Eu(II) and Gd(II)
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is A

Solution and Explanation

Separation by precipitation relies on significant differences in the solubilities of the ions with a common precipitating agent (e.g., sulfate, hydroxide, oxalate). These solubility differences often arise from differences in ionic charge (oxidation state) or, to a lesser extent, ionic radius. Let's analyze the pairs:
  • (A) Eu(II) and Dy(III): Europium has a stable +2 oxidation state, while Dysprosium's stable state is +3. Ions with different charges generally form compounds with vastly different solubilities. For instance, EuSO4 is sparingly soluble, whereas Dy2(SO4)3 is much more soluble. Similarly, their hydroxides would have different solubility products. This difference allows for separation by selective precipitation. (Correct)
  • (B) Gd(III) and Dy(III): Both Gadolinium and Dysprosium are typically in the +3 oxidation state. As adjacent lanthanides, their ionic radii and chemical properties are very similar. Their corresponding salts (e.g., hydroxides, oxalates) tend to have similar solubilities, making separation by simple precipitation difficult. (Incorrect)
  • (C) Eu(II) and Yb(II): Both Europium and Ytterbium can exist in the +2 oxidation state due to stable f7 (for Eu2+) and f14 (for Yb2+) configurations. While both are in the +2 state, there is still a difference in their ionic radii and positions within the lanthanide series, which can lead to differences in the solubility of their salts (e.g., sulfates, carbonates). Separation might be possible through fractional precipitation, exploiting these solubility differences. (Correct)
  • (D) Eu(II) and Gd(II): Europium readily forms Eu(II). Gadolinium, however, strongly prefers the +3 oxidation state to achieve the stable half-filled [Xe]4f7 configuration. Gd(II) is not a common or stable oxidation state under normal aqueous conditions. If we consider these ions as potentially existing, the large difference in stability and electronic configuration between Eu(II) and the unstable Gd(II) would likely lead to different chemical behaviours and potentially different solubilities, allowing separation. Alternatively, if considering the stable forms, one would try to separate Eu(II) from Gd(III), which is similar to case (A). (Correct)
Thus, pairs involving ions with different stable oxidation states (A) or potentially sufficient solubility differences even within the same unstable/less common state (C, D) can be separated by precipitation methods.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0