The given reactions show the behavior of thiosulphate with iodine and bromine:
Let's analyze the reactions:
Thiosulphate with Iodine: In the first reaction, iodine \((I_2)\) is reduced to iodide \((I^-)\), while thiosulphate \((S_2O_3^{2-})\) is oxidized to tetrathionate \((S_4O_6^{2-})\). This indicates that iodine acts as an oxidizing agent.
Thiosulphate with Bromine: In the second reaction, bromine \((Br_2)\) is reduced to bromide \((Br^-)\). Here, the thiosulphate \((S_2O_3^{2-})\) is completely oxidized to sulfate \((SO_4^{2-})\). This shows that bromine acts as a stronger oxidizing agent compared to iodine.
Conclusion:
The difference in behavior is due to the relative strengths of iodine and bromine as oxidizing agents. Bromine is a stronger oxidant than iodine, which is why it can oxidize thiosulphate to a greater extent, all the way to sulfate.
Based on this analysis, the correct statement that justifies the dual behavior of thiosulphate is:
Bromine is a stronger oxidant than iodine.
In the reaction with I$_2$, the oxidation state of sulphur changes from $+2$ to $+2.5$.
In the reaction with Br$_2$, the oxidation state of sulphur changes from $+2$ to $+6$.
Thus, both I$_2$ and Br$_2$ are oxidants, but Br$_2$ is stronger as it increases the oxidation state of sulphur further.
Final Answer:
Bromine is a stronger oxidant than iodine.
200 cc of $x \times 10^{-3}$ M potassium dichromate is required to oxidise 750 cc of 0.6 M Mohr's salt solution in acidic medium. Here x = ______ .

The equivalent resistance between the points \(A\) and \(B\) in the given circuit is \[ \frac{x}{5}\,\Omega. \] Find the value of \(x\). 
Method used for separation of mixture of products (B and C) obtained in the following reaction is: 
In the following \(p\text{–}V\) diagram, the equation of state along the curved path is given by \[ (V-2)^2 = 4ap, \] where \(a\) is a constant. The total work done in the closed path is: 