The problem involves the photoelectric effect, where the maximum kinetic energy of photoelectrons is given by the equation:
\[ KE_{\text{max}} = h\nu - \phi \]
where \( KE_{\text{max}} \) is the maximum kinetic energy, \( h \) is Planck's constant, \( \nu \) is the frequency of the incident light, and \( \phi \) is the work function of the metal.
The frequency \( \nu \) can be expressed in terms of the speed of light \( c \) and the wavelength \( \lambda \) as \( \nu = \frac{c}{\lambda} \). Therefore, the kinetic energy becomes:
\[ KE_{\text{max}} = \frac{hc}{\lambda} - \phi \]
Given the wavelengths \( \lambda_1 = 300 \, \text{nm} \) and \( \lambda_2 = 500 \, \text{nm} \), and the ratio of maximum velocities \( \frac{v_1}{v_2} = 3 \), the kinetic energy is related to velocity as \( KE_{\text{max}} = \frac{1}{2}mv^2 \), where \( m \) is the mass of an electron.
Let's denote the photoelectric equation for both cases:
\[ \frac{hc}{300 \times 10^{-9}} - \phi = \frac{1}{2}m(3v_2)^2 \]
\[ \frac{hc}{500 \times 10^{-9}} - \phi = \frac{1}{2}mv_2^2 \]
Taking the ratio of the kinetic energy equations and solving for \( \phi \):
\[ \frac{\frac{hc}{300 \times 10^{-9}} - \phi}{\frac{hc}{500 \times 10^{-9}} - \phi} = \left(\frac{3v_2}{v_2}\right)^2 = 9 \]
Substituting the constant values \( h = 6.63 \times 10^{-34} \, \text{Js} \) and \( c = 3 \times 10^8 \, \text{m/s} \):
Simplify using \( hc = 1240 \, \text{eV}\cdot \text{nm} \):
\[ \frac{1240/300 - \phi}{1240/500 - \phi} = 9 \]
\[ \frac{4.133 - \phi}{2.48 - \phi} = 9 \]
Solving for \( \phi \):
\[ 4.133 - \phi = 9(2.48 - \phi) \]
\[ 4.133 - \phi = 22.32 - 9\phi \]
\[ 8\phi = 22.32 - 4.133 \]
\[ 8\phi = 18.187 \]
\[ \phi = \frac{18.187}{8} \approx 2.27 \, \text{eV} \]
The closest option to this calculated value is
\( 2.28 \text{ eV} \).
Which of the following statements are correct, if the threshold frequency of caesium is $ 5.16 \times 10^{14} \, \text{Hz} $?