The problem involves the photoelectric effect, where the maximum kinetic energy of photoelectrons is given by the equation:
\[ KE_{\text{max}} = h\nu - \phi \]
where \( KE_{\text{max}} \) is the maximum kinetic energy, \( h \) is Planck's constant, \( \nu \) is the frequency of the incident light, and \( \phi \) is the work function of the metal.
The frequency \( \nu \) can be expressed in terms of the speed of light \( c \) and the wavelength \( \lambda \) as \( \nu = \frac{c}{\lambda} \). Therefore, the kinetic energy becomes:
\[ KE_{\text{max}} = \frac{hc}{\lambda} - \phi \]
Given the wavelengths \( \lambda_1 = 300 \, \text{nm} \) and \( \lambda_2 = 500 \, \text{nm} \), and the ratio of maximum velocities \( \frac{v_1}{v_2} = 3 \), the kinetic energy is related to velocity as \( KE_{\text{max}} = \frac{1}{2}mv^2 \), where \( m \) is the mass of an electron.
Let's denote the photoelectric equation for both cases:
\[ \frac{hc}{300 \times 10^{-9}} - \phi = \frac{1}{2}m(3v_2)^2 \]
\[ \frac{hc}{500 \times 10^{-9}} - \phi = \frac{1}{2}mv_2^2 \]
Taking the ratio of the kinetic energy equations and solving for \( \phi \):
\[ \frac{\frac{hc}{300 \times 10^{-9}} - \phi}{\frac{hc}{500 \times 10^{-9}} - \phi} = \left(\frac{3v_2}{v_2}\right)^2 = 9 \]
Substituting the constant values \( h = 6.63 \times 10^{-34} \, \text{Js} \) and \( c = 3 \times 10^8 \, \text{m/s} \):
Simplify using \( hc = 1240 \, \text{eV}\cdot \text{nm} \):
\[ \frac{1240/300 - \phi}{1240/500 - \phi} = 9 \]
\[ \frac{4.133 - \phi}{2.48 - \phi} = 9 \]
Solving for \( \phi \):
\[ 4.133 - \phi = 9(2.48 - \phi) \]
\[ 4.133 - \phi = 22.32 - 9\phi \]
\[ 8\phi = 22.32 - 4.133 \]
\[ 8\phi = 18.187 \]
\[ \phi = \frac{18.187}{8} \approx 2.27 \, \text{eV} \]
The closest option to this calculated value is
\( 2.28 \text{ eV} \).
Given below are two statements: one is labelled as Assertion (A) and the other one is labelled as Reason (R).
Assertion (A): Emission of electrons in the photoelectric effect can be suppressed by applying a sufficiently negative electron potential to the photoemissive substance.
Reason (R): A negative electric potential, which stops the emission of electrons from the surface of a photoemissive substance, varies linearly with the frequency of incident radiation.
In light of the above statements, choose the most appropriate answer from the options given below: