To determine for which values of \(\alpha\) the vectors \(\vec{a} = \alpha \hat{i} + 6\hat{j} - 3\hat{k}\) and \(\vec{b} = \hat{i} - 2\hat{j} - 2\alpha t\hat{k}\) are inclined at an obtuse angle for all \(t \in \mathbb{R}\), we need to consider the dot product condition for obtuse angles.
The dot product of two vectors \(\vec{a}\) and \(\vec{b}\) is given by:
\(\vec{a} \cdot \vec{b} = (\alpha)(1) + (6)(-2) + (-3)(-2\alpha t)\)
Which simplifies to:
\(\vec{a} \cdot \vec{b} = \alpha - 12 + 6\alpha t\)
For the vectors to be inclined at an obtuse angle, the dot product must be negative:
\(\alpha - 12 + 6\alpha t < 0\)
We can rearrange this to:
\(\alpha(1 + 6t) < 12\)
This inequality should hold for all values of \(t \in \mathbb{R}\). Consider two cases for different values of \(t\):
For these conditions to hold for all values of \(t\), we consider boundary behavior:
Consequently, the entire range of \(( -\infty, 0 )\) is suitable for \(\alpha\). Hence, we only need to consider:
The set \(\left[-\frac{4}{3}, 0\right]\) because \(\alpha < 0\) satisfies the condition for all \(t\).
Thus, the correct answer is \(\left[-\frac{4}{3}, 0\right]\).
The dot product of \(\vec{a}\) and \(\vec{b}\) is:
\[ \vec{a} \cdot \vec{b} = \alpha t + 6(-2) + (-3)(-2\alpha t) = \alpha t - 12 + 6\alpha t. \]
\[ \vec{a} \cdot \vec{b} = (\alpha + 6\alpha)t - 12 = 7\alpha t - 12. \]
For the angle to be obtuse:
\[ \vec{a} \cdot \vec{b} < 0. \]
This gives:
\[ 7\alpha t - 12 < 0 \implies t(7\alpha) - 12 < 0. \]
For all \(t \in \mathbb{R}\), this inequality holds only if:
\[ \alpha < 0 \quad \text{and} \quad -12 < 0. \]
To ensure obtuse angles:
\[ -\frac{4}{3} < \alpha < 0. \]
Final Answer: \((- \frac{4}{3}, 0)\).
Consider the following sequence of reactions : 
Molar mass of the product formed (A) is ______ g mol\(^{-1}\).
In a Young's double slit experiment, three polarizers are kept as shown in the figure. The transmission axes of \( P_1 \) and \( P_2 \) are orthogonal to each other. The polarizer \( P_3 \) covers both the slits with its transmission axis at \( 45^\circ \) to those of \( P_1 \) and \( P_2 \). An unpolarized light of wavelength \( \lambda \) and intensity \( I_0 \) is incident on \( P_1 \) and \( P_2 \). The intensity at a point after \( P_3 \), where the path difference between the light waves from \( S_1 \) and \( S_2 \) is \( \frac{\lambda}{3} \), is:
