Option | Critique |
BRICS currency cannot displace Dollars | Reflects skepticism on currency impact |
Asian economies will not impact Western economy | Reflects skepticism on economic impact |
India-China conflicts will impact progress of BRICS | Reflects concern on BRICS unity |
The correct outcome of the 16th BRICS meeting is Reducing tension between India and China. This conclusion is based on the interactions between Chinese President Xi Jinping and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi during the summit held in Russia. Their meeting, which was a significant highlight, aimed at fostering a more harmonious relationship between the two populous nations after years of hostility.
The summit provided an opportunity for both leaders to announce collaborative efforts post New Delhi's decision to resolve a prolonged military standoff with Beijing along their contested Himalayan border. This emphasis on reducing tensions and increasing bilateral communication and cooperation was a key outcome of the summit discussions.
Based on the provided comprehension, the correct answer to the question about the 16th BRICS achievements is: Diplomatic dialogue between India and China.
The comprehension highlights a meeting between China's President Xi Jinping and India's Prime Minister Narendra Modi at the BRICS summit. This meeting was significant because it was their first formal dialogue in five years and symbolized a potential easing of relations following a prolonged period of tension. This aligns with the answer option "Diplomatic dialogue between India and China."
The other options are not supported by the content:
The letter “S” in BRICS stands for “South Africa.”
BRICS is an acronym for an association of five major emerging national economies: Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa. The addition of South Africa to the group expanded the acronym from BRIC to BRICS. This coalition aims to promote peace, security, and development among member countries and acts as a collective voice on global and regional issues.
\(Exercise\) | \(Country\) |
---|---|
Veer Guardian | Mongolia |
Nomadic Elephant | United States of America |
Vajra Prahar | Japan |
Exercise Maitree | Thailand |
From a very early age, I knew that when I grew up, I should be a writer. I had the lonely child's habit of making up stories and holding conversations with imaginary persons, and I think from the very start my literary ambitions were mixed up with the feeling of being isolated and undervalued. I knew that I had a facility with words and a power of facing unpleasant facts, and I felt that this created a sort of private world in which I could get my own back for my failure in everyday life. I wanted to write enormous naturalistic novels with unhappy endings, full of detailed descriptions and arresting similes, and also full of purple passages in which words were used partly for the sake of their sound. I give all this background information because I do not think one can assess a writer's motives without knowing something of his early development.
His subject-matter will be determined by the age he lives in — at least this is true in tumultuous, revolutionary ages like our own — but before he ever begins to write he will have acquired an emotional attitude from which he will never completely escape. It is his job to discipline his temperament, but if he escapes from his early influences altogether, he will have killed his impulse to write. I think there are four great motives for writing, at any rate for writing prose. They are: (i) Sheer egoism: Desire to seem clever, to be talked about, to be remembered after death, to get your own back on grown-ups who snubbed you in childhood; (ii) Aesthetic enthusiasm: Desire to share an experience which one feels is valuable and ought not to be missed (iii) Historical impulse: Desire to see things as they are, to find out true facts and store them up for the use of posterity (iv) Political purpose: Desire to push the world in a certain direction, to alter other people's idea of the kind of society that they should strive after.
[Extracted with edits from George Orwell's "Why I Write"]