The passage discusses the advancement in biotechnology and the associated challenges in regulating these innovations. It emphasizes that while humans have made significant strides in altering the biology of plants and animals, the regulatory frameworks in place are insufficiently modernized to address the complexities introduced by new technologies. The passage questions if regulation can ever adequately match the pace of human innovation, given the unpredictability and individuality of living organisms and the potential risks when introducing new biological entities or genetic variations.
The answer options present different perspectives on this issue. The correct summary must encapsulate the essence of the passage, highlighting the outdated nature of current regulations and the challenges in creating a regulatory system that is both innovative and flexible, suitable to address the fast-paced developments in biotechnology.
The best summary is: Current regulation of biotechnology is outdated, but it is debatable if we can create a framework, imaginative and flexible, to cover all contingencies in this fast-changing area. This option aligns well with the key points of the passage, acknowledging the outdated regulation and posing a challenge on creating a new adaptable framework that can keep up with biotechnology innovations.