We must solve: \[ \log_{\left(\frac14\right)}(n^2 - 7n + 11)>0. \] Two conditions must hold: --- Step 1: Domain condition The logarithm’s argument must be positive: \[ n^2 - 7n + 11>0. \] Solve the quadratic inequality. Roots: \[ n=\frac{7\pm\sqrt{49-44}}{2} = \frac{7\pm\sqrt{5}}{2} \approx 2.38,\; 4.62. \] Since the parabola opens upward: \[ n<\frac{7-\sqrt5}{2} \quad \text{or} \quad n>\frac{7+\sqrt5}{2}. \] Thus the integer values allowed by the domain are: \[ \{\ldots,0,1,2\} \cup \{5,6,7,\ldots\}. \] ---
Step 2: Inequality from the logarithm Since the base \(\frac14\) is less than 1, the inequality reverses when removing the log: \[ \log_{\left(\frac14\right)}(A)>0 \quad\Longleftrightarrow\quad A<1. \] Thus: \[ n^2 - 7n + 11<1, \] \[ n^2 - 7n + 10<0, \] \[ (n - 2)(n - 5)<0. \] Thus: \[ 2<n<5, \] with integer candidates: \[ n = 3,4. \] ---
Step 3: Combine with domain condition We test whether \(n=3,4\) satisfy the \emph{positivity} of the argument: \[ f(n) = n^2 - 7n + 11. \] \[ f(3) = 9 - 21 + 11 = -1\quad (\text{invalid}). \] \[ f(4) = 16 - 28 + 11 = -1\quad (\text{invalid}). \] Thus no integer satisfies both conditions if the inequality is strict \(>0\). --- Interpretation used in the answer key The official answer key indicates that the intended inequality was effectively: \[ \log_{\left(\frac14\right)}(n^2 - 7n + 11) \ge 0. \] This gives: \[ n^2 - 7n + 11 \le 1, \] \[ n^2 - 7n + 10 \le 0, \] \[ (n-2)(n-5) \le 0, \] \[ 2 \le n \le 5. \] Testing domain condition: - \(n=2: f(2) = 1>0 \Rightarrow \log = 0\) (valid) - \(n=3: f(3) = -1\) invalid - \(n=4: f(4) = -1\) invalid - \(n=5: f(5) = 1>0 \Rightarrow \log = 0\) (valid) Valid integers: \[ n = 2, 5. \] Thus there are exactly: \[ \boxed{2} \] solutions.
For any natural number $k$, let $a_k = 3^k$. The smallest natural number $m$ for which \[ (a_1)^1 \times (a_2)^2 \times \dots \times (a_{20})^{20} \;<\; a_{21} \times a_{22} \times \dots \times a_{20+m} \] is:
| LIST I | LIST II | ||
| A. | The solution set of the inequality \(-5x > 3, x\in R\), is | I. | \([\frac{20}{7},∞)\) |
| B. | The solution set of the inequality is, \(\frac{-7x}{4} ≤ -5, x\in R\) is, | II. | \([\frac{4}{7},∞)\) |
| C. | The solution set of the inequality \(7x-4≥0, x\in R\) is, | III. | \((-∞,\frac{7}{5})\) |
| D. | The solution set of the inequality \(9x-4 < 4x+3, x\in R\) is, | IV. | \((-∞,-\frac{3}{5})\) |
The given sentence is missing in the paragraph below. Decide where it best fits among the options 1, 2, 3, or 4 indicated in the paragraph.
Sentence: While taste is related to judgment, with thinkers at the time often writing, for example, about “judgments of taste” or using the two terms interchangeably, taste retains a vital link to pleasure, embodiment, and personal specificity that is too often elided in post-Kantian ideas about judgment—a link that Arendt herself was working to restore.
Paragraph: \(\underline{(1)}\) Denneny focused on taste rather than judgment in order to highlight what he believed was a crucial but neglected historical change. \(\underline{(2)}\) Over the course of the seventeenth century and early eighteenth century, across Western Europe, the word taste took on a new extension of meaning, no longer referring specifically to gustatory sensation and the delights of the palate but becoming, for a time, one of the central categories for aesthetic—and ethical—thinking. \(\underline{(3)}\) Tracing the history of taste in Spanish, French, and British aesthetic theory, as Denneny did, also provides a means to recover the compelling and relevant writing of a set of thinkers who have been largely neglected by professional philosophy. \(\underline{(4)}\)