The passage revolves around the history of the board game Monopoly, initially invented by Elizabeth Magie to showcase the adverse effects of monopolies. Elizabeth Magie, a left-wing feminist, designed "The Landlord’s Game" with two sets of rules: one focusing on monopolistic dominance and another promoting equitable wealth distribution.
Years later, Charles Darrow sold a simplified version to Parker Brothers, who capitalized on it and credited Darrow as the sole inventor, sidelining Magie's contribution and her original motives. Magie received minimal financial compensation and public recognition.
Let's break down the options:
Conclusion: The first option best captures the essence of the passage as it comprehensively addresses both the origin of the game and the overshadowing of Magie's contributions by Darrow and Parker Brothers. Therefore, the correct answer is the first option.
The passage given below is followed by four summaries. Choose the option that best captures the essence of the passage.
In investigating memory-beliefs, there are certain points which must be borne in mind. In the first place, everything constituting a memory-belief is happening now, not in that past time to which the belief is said to refer. It is not logically necessary to the existence of a memory-belief that the event remembered should have occurred, or even that the past should have existed at all. There is no logical impossibility in the hypothesis that the world sprang into being five minutes ago, exactly as it then was, with a population that "remembered" a wholly unreal past. There is no logically necessary connection between events at different times; therefore nothing that is happening now or will happen in the future can disprove the hypothesis that the world began five minutes ago. Hence the occurrences which are CALLED knowledge of the past are logically independent of the past; they are wholly analysable into present contents, which might, theoretically, be just what they are even if no past had existed.
Para-Summary Paragraph:
Public debates often oversimplify complex issues into binary choices such as right/wrong or safe/unsafe. This reductive framing limits nuanced thinking, discourages dialogue, and pushes people to defend positions rather than understand diverse viewpoints.
Which sentence best summarizes this paragraph?
For any natural number $k$, let $a_k = 3^k$. The smallest natural number $m$ for which \[ (a_1)^1 \times (a_2)^2 \times \dots \times (a_{20})^{20} \;<\; a_{21} \times a_{22} \times \dots \times a_{20+m} \] is: