For any natural number $k$, let $a_k = 3^k$. The smallest natural number $m$ for which \[ (a_1)^1 \times (a_2)^2 \times \dots \times (a_{20})^{20} \;<\; a_{21} \times a_{22} \times \dots \times a_{20+m} \] is:
Given \(a_k = 3^k\).
Step 1: Simplify the LHS. \[ (a_k)^k = (3^k)^k = 3^{k^2}. \] So, \[ \text{LHS} = (a_1)^1 (a_2)^2 \dots (a_{20})^{20} = 3^{1^2} \cdot 3^{2^2} \cdots 3^{20^2} = 3^{1^2 + 2^2 + \dots + 20^2}. \] Use the formula \[ 1^2 + 2^2 + \dots + n^2 = \frac{n(n+1)(2n+1)}{6}. \] For \(n=20\): \[ \sum_{k=1}^{20} k^2 = \frac{20 \cdot 21 \cdot 41}{6} = 10 \cdot 7 \cdot 41 = 2870. \] Thus \[ \text{LHS} = 3^{2870}. \]
Step 2: Simplify the RHS. \[ \text{RHS} = a_{21} a_{22} \cdots a_{20+m} = 3^{21} \cdot 3^{22} \cdots 3^{20+m} = 3^{21 + 22 + \dots + (20+m)}. \] The exponent is the sum of an arithmetic progression: First term \(= 21\), last term \(= 20 + m\), number of terms \(= m\). Sum: \[ 21 + 22 + \dots + (20+m) = \frac{m}{2}\bigl(21 + (20+m)\bigr) = \frac{m}{2}(41 + m). \] So \[ \text{RHS} = 3^{\frac{m(m+41)}{2}}. \]
Step 3: Set up the inequality. We need \[ 3^{2870}<3^{\frac{m(m+41)}{2}}. \] Since the base \(3>1\), compare exponents: \[ 2870<\frac{m(m+41)}{2}, \] \[ 5740<m^2 + 41m, \] \[ m^2 + 41m - 5740>0. \] Solve the quadratic equation \[ m^2 + 41m - 5740 = 0. \] \[ m = \frac{-41 \pm \sqrt{41^2 + 4\cdot 5740}}{2} = \frac{-41 \pm \sqrt{1681 + 22960}}{2} = \frac{-41 \pm \sqrt{24641}}{2}. \] Now \[ 157^2 = 24649,\quad 156^2 = 24336, \] so \[ \sqrt{24641} \approx 156.97. \] Positive root: \[ m \approx \frac{-41 + 156.97}{2} \approx \frac{115.97}{2} \approx 57.98. \] Thus the quadratic is positive for \(m>57.98\), so the smallest natural number satisfying the inequality is \[ m = 58. \]
Step 4: Quick verification around the boundary. Check \(m=57\): \[ \frac{m(m+41)}{2} = \frac{57\cdot 98}{2} = \frac{5586}{2} = 2793<2870 \quad\Rightarrow\quad \text{RHS exponent}<\text{LHS exponent}. \] Check \(m=58\): \[ \frac{58\cdot 99}{2} = \frac{5742}{2} = 2871>2870 \quad\Rightarrow\quad \text{RHS exponent}>\text{LHS exponent}. \] So \(m=58\) is indeed the smallest valid natural number. Therefore, the required smallest \(m\) is \[ \boxed{58}. \]
| LIST I | LIST II | ||
| A. | The solution set of the inequality \(-5x > 3, x\in R\), is | I. | \([\frac{20}{7},∞)\) |
| B. | The solution set of the inequality is, \(\frac{-7x}{4} ≤ -5, x\in R\) is, | II. | \([\frac{4}{7},∞)\) |
| C. | The solution set of the inequality \(7x-4≥0, x\in R\) is, | III. | \((-∞,\frac{7}{5})\) |
| D. | The solution set of the inequality \(9x-4 < 4x+3, x\in R\) is, | IV. | \((-∞,-\frac{3}{5})\) |
The given sentence is missing in the paragraph below. Decide where it best fits among the options 1, 2, 3, or 4 indicated in the paragraph.
Sentence: While taste is related to judgment, with thinkers at the time often writing, for example, about “judgments of taste” or using the two terms interchangeably, taste retains a vital link to pleasure, embodiment, and personal specificity that is too often elided in post-Kantian ideas about judgment—a link that Arendt herself was working to restore.
Paragraph: \(\underline{(1)}\) Denneny focused on taste rather than judgment in order to highlight what he believed was a crucial but neglected historical change. \(\underline{(2)}\) Over the course of the seventeenth century and early eighteenth century, across Western Europe, the word taste took on a new extension of meaning, no longer referring specifically to gustatory sensation and the delights of the palate but becoming, for a time, one of the central categories for aesthetic—and ethical—thinking. \(\underline{(3)}\) Tracing the history of taste in Spanish, French, and British aesthetic theory, as Denneny did, also provides a means to recover the compelling and relevant writing of a set of thinkers who have been largely neglected by professional philosophy. \(\underline{(4)}\)