This question is easy if you read the passage carefully. The passage mentions hybrid organizations and highlights that it is easier for them to attract people compared to non-hybrid organizations.
Option 1 is ruled out because it overly focuses on 9/11, which is just a minor detail used as an example of hybrid organizations attracting more people. Option 2 does not mention hybrid organizations at all, making it incorrect.
Option 3 misrepresents the information. While hybrid organizations do attract people from anti-war movements, these movements are just an example. Hybrid organizations might attract individuals from any social movement, not exclusively anti-war movements. Option 4, on the other hand, accurately represents the passage and is the best choice.
Global literacy rate % | \(\text{People of different age-groups}\) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
12 – 15 years | 15 – 24 years | 25 – 64 years | 65 years and older | |
Men | 88 | 90 | 88 | 80 |
Women | 80 | 88 | 79 | 75 |
Chemical Free? | Environmentally Friendly? | Recyclable? | Durable? | Lightweight? | Easy to clean? | Dishwasher safe? | Affordable? | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Glass Bottles | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | No |
Silicone Bottles | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | – | Yes | Yes | No |
Stainless Steel Bottles | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | No |
Plastic Bottles | No | No | Yes | – | Yes | – | – | Yes |
Year | Population (Million) | Per capita water availability (m³/year) |
---|---|---|
1951 | 361 | 5177 |
1955 | 395 | 4732 |
1991 | 846 | 2209 |
2001 | 1027 | 1820 |
2025 | 1394 | 1341 |
2050 | 1640 | 1140 |