The passage discusses the intersection of biological logic and technological advancements, emphasizing the blending of natural systems with human-made systems. To determine the correct set of keywords from the given options, we should identify key concepts that the passage highlights. These central themes include:
Based on this analysis, the option "Complex systems; Bio-logic; Bioengineering; Technos-logic; Convergence" best encapsulates the primary themes of the passage.
The author asserts that "Part of this bionic convergence is a matter of words," suggesting a deeper merging of concepts traditionally seen as distinct. Within the context of the passage, this convergence refers to the blurring lines between mechanical and biological systems. The correct interpretation from the options given is: "Mechanical” and “life” were earlier seen as opposite in meaning, but the difference between the two is increasingly blurred." This statement captures the essence of the convergence described, where the terms "mechanical" and "life" are no longer strictly opposing but rather merging in definition as their characteristics overlap. The passage elucidates how advancements in technology and genetic engineering are increasingly intertwining, leading to creations that exhibit qualities of both life and machinery. Consequently, the distinction between the organic and the mechanical is diminishing, exemplified by the evolution of concepts and language, supporting the selected statement as the best expression of the author's point.
The author's statement, "The apparent veil between the organic and the manufactured has crumpled to reveal that the two really are and have always been, of one being," suggests a blending or merging of the boundaries between naturally occurring and human-made entities. This implies that distinctions traditionally made between nature and things produced by humans are increasingly becoming blurred due to advancements, particularly in technology. Understanding this context is important to determine which statement best reflects this idea.
The most fitting statement is: Scientific advances are making it increasingly difficult to distinguish between organic reality and manufactured reality.
The passage provides context for this idea by discussing how natural processes and technological advancements are converging. This includes examples of bioengineering, where biological logic is utilized in machines, and technological elements are incorporated into life forms. As a result, the manufactured is behaving more like the organic, and vice versa. It supports the notion behind the author's original claim that scientific progress is weaving together the organic and manufactured realms into a unified entity.
The question asks which statement is implied by the passage. Let's analyze each option:
Passage Analysis:
The passage discusses the convergence of biological and mechanical logic, emphasizing the role of bioengineering. It highlights historical insight into abstracting life laws and applying them elsewhere. The passage also describes how bioengineering shares purposes with historical animal and plant breeding, aiming to direct evolution artificially, accelerating technological development.
Option Analysis:
Purposeful design represents the pinnacle of scientific expertise in the service of human betterment and civilisational progress.
The passage does mention purposeful design but does not imply it is the pinnacle of scientific expertise as the primary discussion is around how technos logic is applied to biology.
The biological realm is as complex as the mechanical one; which is why the logic of Bios is being imported into machines.
Although the passage discusses using biological logic in machines, it does not categorize complexity equivalently in both realms but uses biological logic for complex systems.
Historically, philosophers have known that the laws of life can be abstracted and applied elsewhere.
The passage states philosophers suspected this, but it's more about the proof emerging with computer complexity, not historical certainty.
Genetic engineers and bioengineers are the same insofar as they both seek to force evolution in an artificial way.
The passage explicitly states genetic engineering is akin to historical methods with more precision, directly linking the objectives of genetic engineers and bioengineers to artificially manipulate evolution.
Therefore, the implied statement is: Genetic engineers and bioengineers are the same insofar as they both seek to force evolution in an artificial way.
The passage below is accompanied by four questions. Based on the passage, choose the best answer for each question.
In the summer of 2022, subscribers to the US streaming service HBO MAX were alarmed to discover that dozens of the platform’s offerings – from the Covid-themed heist thriller Locked Down to the recent remake of The Witches – had been quietly removed from the service . . . The news seemed like vindication to those who had long warned that streaming was more about controlling access to the cultural commons than expanding it, as did reports (since denied by the show’s creators) that Netflix had begun editing old episodes of Stranger Things to retroactively improve their visual effects.
What’s less clear is whether the commonly prescribed cure for these cultural ills – a return to the material pleasures of physical media – is the right one. While the makers of Blu-ray discs claim they have a shelf life of 100 years, such statistics remain largely theoretical until they come to pass, and are dependent on storage conditions, not to mention the continued availability of playback equipment. The humble DVD has already proved far less resilient, with many early releases already beginning to deteriorate in quality Digital movie purchases provide even less security. Any film “bought” on iTunes could disappear if you move to another territory with a different rights agreement and try to redownload it. It’s a bold new frontier in the commodification of art: the birth of the product recall. After a man took to Twitter to bemoan losing access to Cars 2 after moving from Canada to Australia, Apple clarified that users who downloaded films to their devices would retain permanent access to those downloads, even if they relocated to a hemisphere where the [content was] subject to a different set of rights agreements. Thanks to the company’s ironclad digital rights management technology, however, such files cannot be moved or backed up, locking you into watching with your Apple account.
Anyone who does manage to acquire Digital Rights Management free (DRM-free) copies of their favourite films must nonetheless grapple with ever-changing file format standards, not to mention data decay – the gradual process by which electronic information slowly but surely corrupts. Only the regular migration of files from hard drive to hard drive can delay the inevitable, in a sisyphean battle against the ravages of digital time.
In a sense, none of this is new. Charlie Chaplin burned the negative of his 1926 film A Woman of the Sea as a tax write-off. Many more films have been lost through accident, negligence or plain indifference. During a heatwave in July 1937, a Fox film vault in New Jersey burned down, destroying a majority of the silent films produced by the studio.
Back then, at least, cinema was defined by its ephemerality: the sense that a film was as good as gone once it left your local cinema. Today, with film studios keen to stress the breadth of their back catalogues (or to put in Hollywood terms, the value of their IPs), audiences may start to wonder why those same studios seem happy to set the vault alight themselves if it’ll help next quarter’s numbers.
When $10^{100}$ is divided by 7, the remainder is ?