The question asks us to infer why in the Ebola misdiagnosis case, doctors probably "missed the forest for the trees". Let's analyze the provided comprehension and logical options:
The passage explains how reliance on advanced digital templates and software in medicine can lead to "tunnel vision" and constricted thinking. This is because the templates are primarily optimized for data capture at the expense of effective triage and diagnosis. This insinuates that the medical professionals may focus too narrowly on data provided by software tools rather than applying broad critical thinking and traditional examination techniques.
In the misdiagnosis case, researchers noted that the digital templates contributed to this tunnel vision. The passage states: "These highly constrained tools... are optimized for data capture but at the expense of sacrificing their utility for appropriate triage and diagnosis."
From the comprehension, it is evident that the main issue was the over-reliance on digital data processed by the templates, leading to inadequate diagnostic approaches.
Presuming a comprehensive understanding of the passage, the most plausible interpretation is the explanation that doctors were overly guided by the data processed through digital templates, hence missing the broader picture. Therefore, the best answer is:
"they were led by the data processed by digital templates."
The central theme of the passage is the author's apprehension regarding the use of sophisticated automation technology. The passage discusses several concerns about how automation might negatively impact human abilities, especially concerning thinking and learning. Let's analyze each option to determine which is NOT a reason for the author's apprehension:
it could mislead people: The passage mentions the danger of automation leading users to rely on computer prompts instead of deep thinking. An example is the misdiagnosis case where digital templates led to tunnel vision. Therefore, misleading people is a valid concern from the author.
it stops users from exercising their minds: The author argues that sophisticated software short-circuits thinking and learning by providing too much assistance, thus diminishing mind exercise. This is clearly a point of apprehension.
computers could replace humans: The passage emphasizes the partnership between humans and technology, noting that software should assist rather than replace. There's no direct mention of concern that computers could replace humans entirely, but rather the fear is more about diminished human capabilities.
it stunts the development of its users: The text describes how easy software prevents skill sharpening, supporting the idea that user development can be stunted, aligning with the author's concerns.
After analyzing each option, the concern that "computers could replace humans" is actually not articulated in the passage as a direct fear of the author. Therefore, this is the correct answer as it does not align with the author's apprehensions.
The question requires identifying which option does not align with the concept of "human-centered automation" as described in the passage.
Explanation: To solve this, we analyze the key idea of "human-centered automation" presented in the passage: a system where technology serves as an assistant to human expertise, enhancing and complementing human skills rather than replacing them. The passage emphasizes that such systems should take over routine tasks, issue alerts, provide additional information, and counter human biases, but the human still remains in control, using the system to enhance their capabilities.
Now, let’s analyze each option:
Correct Answer: Software that auto-completes text when the user writes an email.
When $10^{100}$ is divided by 7, the remainder is ?