Comprehension

The passage below is accompanied by a set of questions. Choose the best answer to each question. Stoicism was founded in 300 BC by the Greek philosopher Zeno and survived into the Roman era until about AD 300. According to the Stoics, emotions consist of two movements. The first movement is the immediate feeling and other reactions (e.g., physiological response) that occur when a stimulus or event occurs. For instance, consider what could have happened if an army general accused Marcus Aurelius of treason in front of other officers. The first movement for Marcus may have been (internal) surprise and anger in response to this insult, accompanied perhaps by some involuntary physiological and expressive responses such as face flushing and a movement of the eyebrows. The second movement is what one does next about the emotion. Second movement behaviors occur after thinking and are under one’s control. Examples of second movements for Marcus might have included a plot to seek revenge, actions signifying deference and appeasement, or perhaps proceeding as he would have proceeded whether or not this event occurred: continuing to lead the Romans in a way that Marcus Aurelius believed best benefited them. In the Stoic view, choosing a reasoned, unemotional response as the second movement is the only appropriate response. The Stoics believed that to live the good life and be a good person, we need to free ourselves of nearly all desires such as too much desire for money, power, or sexual gratification. Prior to second movements, we can consider what is important in life. Money, power, and excessive sexual gratification are not important. Character, rationality, and kindness are important. The Epicureans, first associated with the Greek philosopher Epicurus . . . held a similar view, believing that people should enjoy simple pleasures, such as good conversation, friendship, food, and wine, but not be indulgent in these pursuits and not follow passion for those things that hold no real value like power and money. As Oatley (2004) states, “the Epicureans articulated a view—enjoyment of relationship with friends, of things that are real rather than illusory, simple rather than artificially inflated, possible rather than vanishingly unlikely—that is certainly relevant today” . . . In sum, these ancient Greek and Roman philosophers saw emotions, especially strong ones, as potentially dangerous. They viewed emotions as experiences that needed to be [reined] in and controlled. As Oatley (2004) points out, the Stoic idea bears some similarity to Buddhism. Buddha, living in India in the 6th century BC, argued for cultivating a certain attitude that decreases the probability of (in Stoic terms) destructive second movements. Through meditation and the right attitude, one allows emotions to happen to oneself (it is impossible to prevent this), but one is advised to observe the emotions without necessarily acting on them; one achieves some distance and decides what has value and what does not have value. Additionally, the Stoic idea of developing virtue in oneself, of becoming a good person, which the Stoics believed we could do because we have a touch of the divine, laid the foundation for the three monotheistic religions: Judaism, Christianity, and Islam . . . As with Stoicism, tenets of these religions include controlling our emotions lest we engage in sinful behavior.

Question: 1

“Through meditation and the right attitude, one allows emotions to happen to oneself (it is impossible to prevent this), but one is advised to observe the emotions without necessarily acting on them; one achieves some distance and decides what has value and what does not have value.” In the context of the passage, which one of the following is not a possible implication of the quoted statement?

Updated On: Aug 20, 2024
  • Emotional responses can make it difficult to distinguish valuable experiences from valueless experiences.
  • “Meditation and the right attitude”, in this instance, implies an initially passive reception of all experiences.
  • Meditation allows certain out-of-body experiences that permit us to gain the distance necessary to control our emotions.
  • The observation of emotions in a distant manner corresponds to the second movement referred to earlier in the passage.
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is C

Solution and Explanation

Many questions in CAT RCs can be answered by carefully reading the question. In this case, the quoted text mentions "...one allows emotions to happen to oneself." Since the focus is on emotions happening to oneself, out-of-body experiences are not relevant. Therefore, option 3 is not a possible implication of the quoted statement. All the other choices are possible implications.

Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 2

Which one of the following statements would be an accurate inference from the example of Marcus Aurelius?

Updated On: Aug 20, 2024
  • Marcus Aurelius was one of the leaders of the Roman army.
  • Marcus Aurelius was humiliated by the accusation of treason in front of the other officers.
  • Marcus Aurelius was a Stoic whose philosophy survived into the Roman era.
  • Marcus Aurelius plotted revenge in his quest for justice
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is A

Solution and Explanation

This question has moderate difficulty. While discussing the behaviors in the second movement (in the first half of the passage), the author mentions "...continuing to lead the Romans in a way that Marcus Aurelius believed best benefited them..." The use of the phrase 'continuing to lead' suggests that this is something he actually did and would have continued to do, even in the hypothetical scenario considered at the start of the passage. Therefore, option 1 can be inferred, while the others cannot. Option 2 is not the correct choice because it is a hypothetical situation created by the author to explain the first and second movement behaviors.

Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 3

Which one of the following statements, if false, could be seen as contradicting the facts/arguments in the passage?

Updated On: Sep 17, 2024
  • Despite practising meditation and cultivating the right attitude, emotions cannot ever be controlled.
  • The Greek philosopher Zeno survived into the Roman era until about AD 300.
  • In the Stoic view, choosing a reasoned, unemotional response as the first movement is an appropriate response to emotional situations.
  • In the Epicurean view, indulging in simple pleasures is not desirable.
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is D

Solution and Explanation

When the question asks, "which of the following, if false, could be seen as contradicting the arguments," it essentially means identifying the statement that, if true, would support the arguments in the passage. To simplify, replace 'if false' with 'if true' and 'contradicting/weakening' with 'supporting/strengthening'. In this question, we are seeking a choice that aligns with the passage. Option 1 contradicts the passage's information about Buddhism and the positive effects of meditation, so it's ruled out. Option 2 is eliminated as there's no evidence of Greek philosopher Zeno surviving until AD 300. The selection of a reasoned, unemotional response is associated with the second movement, not the first. By process of elimination, option 4 emerges as the best choice, but some might find evidence contradicting it. There's a nuance in Epicurean views - they advocate enjoying simple pleasures, not indulging in them. Enjoying and indulging are distinct, and Epicureans oppose indulgence, not enjoyment. Therefore, option 4 is the best answer as it aligns with the passage.

Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 4

On the basis of the passage, which one of the following statements can be regarded as true?

Updated On: Aug 20, 2024
  • There were no Stoics in India at the time of the Roman civilisation.
  • The Epicureans believed in controlling all emotions.
  • The Stoic influences can be seen in multiple religions.
  • The Stoics valorised the pursuit of money, power, and sexual gratification.
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is C

Solution and Explanation

The passage doesn't discuss India in relation to the Stoics, so option 1 is ruled out. Epicureans didn't advocate for controlling emotions but instead focused on the simple pleasures of life. Based on the last sentence of the paragraph, option 3 is supported as true, stating that 'The Stoic idea laid the foundation for three monotheistic religions.' Therefore, option 3 is the best answer.

Was this answer helpful?
0
0

Top Questions on Historical Events

View More Questions

Questions Asked in CAT exam

View More Questions