Many questions in CAT RCs can be answered by carefully reading the question. In this case, the quoted text mentions "...one allows emotions to happen to oneself." Since the focus is on emotions happening to oneself, out-of-body experiences are not relevant. Therefore, option 3 is not a possible implication of the quoted statement. All the other choices are possible implications.
This question has moderate difficulty. While discussing the behaviors in the second movement (in the first half of the passage), the author mentions "...continuing to lead the Romans in a way that Marcus Aurelius believed best benefited them..." The use of the phrase 'continuing to lead' suggests that this is something he actually did and would have continued to do, even in the hypothetical scenario considered at the start of the passage. Therefore, option 1 can be inferred, while the others cannot. Option 2 is not the correct choice because it is a hypothetical situation created by the author to explain the first and second movement behaviors.
When the question asks, "which of the following, if false, could be seen as contradicting the arguments," it essentially means identifying the statement that, if true, would support the arguments in the passage. To simplify, replace 'if false' with 'if true' and 'contradicting/weakening' with 'supporting/strengthening'. In this question, we are seeking a choice that aligns with the passage. Option 1 contradicts the passage's information about Buddhism and the positive effects of meditation, so it's ruled out. Option 2 is eliminated as there's no evidence of Greek philosopher Zeno surviving until AD 300. The selection of a reasoned, unemotional response is associated with the second movement, not the first. By process of elimination, option 4 emerges as the best choice, but some might find evidence contradicting it. There's a nuance in Epicurean views - they advocate enjoying simple pleasures, not indulging in them. Enjoying and indulging are distinct, and Epicureans oppose indulgence, not enjoyment. Therefore, option 4 is the best answer as it aligns with the passage.
The passage doesn't discuss India in relation to the Stoics, so option 1 is ruled out. Epicureans didn't advocate for controlling emotions but instead focused on the simple pleasures of life. Based on the last sentence of the paragraph, option 3 is supported as true, stating that 'The Stoic idea laid the foundation for three monotheistic religions.' Therefore, option 3 is the best answer.
\(\text{Dance Form}\) | \(\text{State of Origin}\) |
---|---|
Bharatanatyam | Tamil Nadu |
Sattriya | Assam |
Kathakali | Kerala |
Kuchipudi | Andhra Pradesh |