To understand the nature of India's binding commitment to reduce carbon emissions through international treaties like the Paris Agreement, it's essential to comprehend India's obligations and legal context. The 42nd Constitutional Amendment Act of 1976 specifically incorporated environmental protection into the Constitution via Article 48-A and Article 51-A (g). The Indian Supreme Court has repeatedly ruled that both state and citizens have a fundamental duty to protect natural resources.
During COP 21, India was among 196 countries to sign the Paris Agreement, committing to limit greenhouse gas emissions. Key objectives include generating 50% of energy from renewable sources, producing 500 GW from non-fossil fuels by 2030, and reducing carbon emissions by one billion tons. The Supreme Court's decision further enforces the right to a clean environment, aligning with Article 21 which guarantees the right to life, thus inferring a responsibility to maintain ecological balance.
Given this legal foundation and international commitment, the statement that best describes India's binding commitment is: The signatory may take adequate measures to reduce carbon emission. This reflects India's active and significant obligation to engage in measures that meaningfully address carbon emissions.
Given these explanations, the correct answer to what is explicitly mentioned in Article 51-A(g) is:
Only (A) and (B)The question is centered on the fundamental duty regarding the preservation and protection of natural resources as interpreted by the Supreme Court in India. The comprehension provided gives an overview of how environmental protection is integrated into the Indian Constitution, mainly through Articles 48-A and 51-A (g), and acknowledges the Supreme Court's stance on this matter.
The comprehension specifies that the Court's judgments have ruled that both the state and its citizens share the responsibility to safeguard natural resources. This is further solidified by statements about the state's duty to maintain ecological balance and the citizens' right to a clean environment.
Analyzing the answer options given:
| Option | Description |
|---|---|
| The fundamental duty to preserve and protect natural resources is upon the State only | Incorrect, as the duty is shared with citizens. |
| Citizens have the fundamental duty to preserve and protect natural resources | Incomplete, as the state also has this duty. |
| Both the state and citizens have the duty to preserve and protect natural resources | Correct, aligns with the Supreme Court's interpretation and constitutional provisions. |
| Citizen’s duty to maintain ecological balance and citizens’ right against climate change | Partially true but does not emphasize the state's responsibility. |
Thus, the correct answer is: Both the state and citizens have the duty to preserve and protect natural resources, as this reflects the shared responsibility emphasized by the Supreme Court and the Indian Constitution.
On the night of October 12th, the "Sunburst Medallion" was stolen from the highly secured display case in the city museum. The theft occurred sometime between the museum closing at 10:00 PM and the night guard, Mr. Hemant, completing his final round at 1:00 AM. Three primary suspects were identified, all of whom had recently been dismissed from their museum positions: Anjali, the former curator; Bharat, the former security expert; and Chitra, the former exhibits designer.
Here are the established facts and their alibis:
Further investigation revealed that a small, distinctive silver button was found near the display case. Anjali is known to frequently wear a coat with similar unique silver buttons. The security expert, Bharat, had previously boasted that he could remotely disable a certain type of magnetic lock—the same type used on the medallion's case—without needing the code, though the log suggests the code was used. (269 words)
In a small town lived a close-knit family where every relation could be expressed through simple symbols. For instance, when they said \( A \times B \), it meant \( A \) is the father of \( B \), while \( A \div B \) meant \( A \) is the mother of \( B \). The younger ones were often introduced with \( A + B \), meaning \( A \) was the daughter of \( B \), and the bond of brotherhood was shown by \( A - B \) (A is brother of B).
One day, the children in the family turned these symbols into a playful code. Instead of introducing their parents and siblings in words, they spoke only in symbols. “Look,” giggled little Meena, “\( M + N \div O \)!” Everyone laughed, because they knew it meant Meena was the daughter of \( N \), and \( N \) was the mother of \( O \), making her \( O \)’s sister. What started as a code soon became a family game, making the bonds of father, mother, daughter, and brother not just relations, but symbols of love and togetherness. (165 words)
Four teams – Red (R), Blue (B), Green (G), and Yellow (Y) – are competing in the final four rounds of the Inter-School Science Olympiad, labeled Round A, Round B, Round C, and Round D. Each round consists of one match between two teams, and every team plays exactly two matches. No team plays the same opponent more than once.
The final schedule must adhere to the following rules:
(193 words)
Health insurance plays a vital role in ensuring financial protection and access to quality healthcare. In India, however, the extent and nature of health insurance coverage vary significantly between urban and rural areas. While urban populations often have better access to organized insurance schemes, employer-provided coverage, and awareness about health policies, rural populations face challenges such as limited outreach of insurance schemes, inadequate infrastructure, and lower awareness levels. This urban-rural divide in health insurance coverage highlights the broader issue of healthcare inequality, making it essential to analyze the factors contributing to this gap and explore strategies for more inclusive health protection. A state-level health survey was conducted.
The survey covered 1,80,000 adults across urban and rural areas. Urban residents formed 55% of the sample (that is, 99,000 people) while rural residents made up 45% (that is, 81,000 people). In each area, coverage was classified under four heads – Public schemes, Private insurance, Employer-provided coverage, and Uninsured. In urban areas, Public coverage accounted for 28% of the urban population, Private for 22%, Employer for 18%, and the remaining 32% were Uninsured. In rural areas, where formal coverage is generally lower, Public coverage stood at 35%, Private at 10%, Employer at 8%, while 47% were Uninsured.
For this survey, “Insured” includes everyone covered by Public + Private + Employer schemes, and “Uninsured” indicates those with no coverage at all. Officials noted that public schemes remain the backbone of rural coverage, while employer and private plans are relatively more prevalent in urban centres. (250 words)