Comprehension
‘So pick a bird,’ Iff commanded. ‘Any bird.’ This was puzzling. ‘The only bird around here is a wooden peacock,’ Haroun pointed out, reasonably enough. Iff gave a snort of disgust. ‘A person may choose what he cannot see,’ he said, as if explaining something very obvious to a very foolish individual. ‘A person may mention a bird’s name even if the creature is not present and correct: crow, quail, hummingbird, bulbul, mynah, parrot, kite. A person may even select a flying creature of his own invention, for example winged horse, flying turtle, airborne whale, space serpent or aeromouse. To give a thing a name, a label, a handle; to rescue it from anonymity, to pluck it out of the Place of Namelessness, in short to identify it — well, that’s a way of bringing the said thing into being. Or, in this case, the said bird or Imaginary Flying Organism.’

‘That may be true where you come from,’ Haroun argued. ‘But in these parts, stricter rules apply.’

‘In these parts,’ rejoined blue-bearded Iff, ‘I am having time wasted by someone who will not trust in what he can’t see. How much have you seen, eh? Africa, have you seen it? No? Then is it truly there? And submarines? Huh? Also, hailstones, baseballs, pagodas? Goldmines? Kangaroos, Mount Fujiyama, the North Pole? And the past, did it happen? And the future, will it come? Believe in your own eyes and you’ll get into a lot of trouble, hot water, a mess.’ With that, he plunged his hand into a pocket of his auberginey pajamas, and when he brought it forth again it was bunched into a fist. ‘So take a look, or I should say a gander, at the enclosed.’ He opened his hand, and Haroun’s eyes almost fell out of his head. Tiny birds were walking about on Iff’s palm; and pecking at it, and flapping their miniature wings to hover just above it. And as well as birds there were fabulous winged creatures out of legends: an Assyrian lion with the head of a bearded man and a pair of large hairy wings growing out of its flanks; and winged monkeys, flying saucers, tiny angels, levitating (and apparently air-breathing) fish. ‘What’s your pleasure, select, choose,’ Iff urged. And although it seemed obvious to Haroun that these magical creatures were so small that they couldn’t possibly have carried so much as a bitten-off fingernail, he decided not to argue and pointed at a tiny crested bird that was giving him a sidelong look through one highly intelligent eye.

[Extracted, with edits and revisions, from Haroun and the Sea of Stories, by Salman Rushdie, Granta & Penguin, 1990.]
Question: 1

If Iff is right, which of the following statements is true?

Show Hint

When a question says “If X is right,” isolate X’s thesis in the author’s own words, paraphrase it precisely (avoid “only,” “always,” “never” over-statements), and then match that paraphrase to the option.
Updated On: Aug 13, 2025
  • You should only trust what you cannot see
  • Naming something is the only way to make it unreal
  • You should only trust what you can see
  • Naming something is one way to make it real
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is D

Solution and Explanation

Step 1 (Extract Iff’s core claim from the passage).
Iff says: “To give a thing a name, a label, a handle; to rescue it from anonymity, to pluck it out of the Place of Namelessness… that’s a way of bringing the said thing into being.” This means that naming/identifying something confers a kind of reality (existence) to it, at least conceptually or imaginatively. Step 2 (Distinguish Iff’s position from Haroun’s).
Haroun insists on “stricter rules” and is skeptical of what he can’t see; Iff rebukes that skepticism (“A person may choose what he cannot see”), pushing the idea that imagination + naming can make present what is absent. Step 3 (Evaluate each option carefully).
(A) “Only trust what you cannot see” — Iff encourages trust beyond the visible, but never says “only.” Over-strong and incorrect.
(B) Says naming makes something unreal; Iff argues the exact opposite.
(C) This is Haroun’s stance (“trust what you can see”), which Iff warns against.
(D) Matches Iff word-for-word: naming is one way to bring something into being (to make it real). Step 4 (Conclusion).
Therefore, (D) correctly captures Iff’s philosophy. \[ \boxed{\text{(D) Naming something is one way to make it real}} \]
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 2

Which of the following applies to Iff?

Show Hint

Proverbs are stock sayings; metaphors are fresh comparisons crafted by the speaker. Look for invented images and extended comparisons to spot metaphors.
Updated On: Aug 13, 2025
  • He speaks in contradictions
  • He has a habit of speaking in synonyms
  • He uses proverbs to express ideas
  • He uses metaphors to describe things
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is D

Solution and Explanation

Step 1 (Observe Iff’s language).
Iff doesn’t present textbook definitions; he paints images: “Place of Namelessness,” “pluck it out,” lists of imaginary flying organisms (winged horse, airborne whale, space serpent). These are vivid figurative devices used to explain an abstract idea (how naming animates existence). Step 2 (Eliminate look-alike options).
(A) Contradictions? No—the thread is consistent: trust beyond the visible, and naming confers presence.
(B) Synonyms? His lists (crow, quail, hummingbird…) are examples, not synonymy.
(C) Proverbs? Nothing like fixed folk sayings; the phrasing is original, not proverbial. Step 3 (Choose the best descriptor).
Metaphorical/figurative speech fits perfectly; hence (D). \[ \boxed{\text{(D) He uses metaphors to describe things}} \]
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 3

Which of the following most accurately describes what the underlined sentence means in context? (“Believe in your own eyes and you’ll get into a lot of trouble, hot water, a mess.”)

Show Hint

When paraphrasing an underlined sentence, first restate it in plain prose, then choose the option that preserves both scope and tone (avoid options that reverse the claim or add new ideas).
Updated On: Aug 13, 2025
  • Do not restrict your knowledge only to what you can physically see
  • Accept everything you see uncritically
  • Trusting your senses is a recipe for success
  • Learn not to appreciate viewpoints other than your own
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is A

Solution and Explanation

Step 1 (Read the build-up).
Iff challenges Haroun with unseen realities: “Africa, have you seen it? No? Then is it truly there? … the past, did it happen? and the future, will it come?” He shows that many things we must accept are not directly visible now. Step 2 (Interpret the warning).
Believe in your own eyes” = relying only on current sense-perception. Trouble follows because that stance would absurdly deny faraway places, past events, future occurrences, and imagined possibilities. Step 3 (Option test).
(A) Precisely restates the lesson: don’t limit knowledge to the seen.
(B) “Accept everything you see” is not the point; the caution is against over-reliance on sight, not credulity about appearances.
(C) Opposite of the warning.
(D) About viewpoint intolerance—irrelevant here. Step 4 (Conclude).
Therefore (A) is the most accurate paraphrase. \[ \boxed{\text{(A) Do not restrict knowledge only to what you can see}} \]
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 4

All the words below are related in meaning, except:

Show Hint

For “odd one out,” first cluster words by meaning. The intruder won’t fit the shared semantic core or usage in context.
Updated On: Aug 13, 2025
  • Levitate
  • Fly
  • Hover
  • Gander
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is D

Solution and Explanation

Step 1 (Group by semantic field).
(A) Levitate: to rise/float in the air (often mysteriously).
(B) Fly: to move through the air under power or by wings.
(C) Hover: to remain suspended in air at one place. All three denote airborne states/motion—same field.
Step 2 (Interpret “gander”).
In context, Iff says, “take a gander at the enclosed” — here gander = “a look/glance” (verb). It is not an airborne action; it belongs to the seeing/looking field (and as a noun it can mean a male goose). Step 3 (Odd-one-out).
Therefore (D) is the only word not tied to flight/air-suspension. \[ \boxed{\text{(D) Gander}} \]
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 5

What does “fabulous” mean in the passage?

Show Hint

Many words (like fabulous) have several senses. Lock meaning to the nearest textual clue; here “out of legends” forces the “mythical” sense.
Updated On: Aug 13, 2025
  • Very good
  • Unbelievable
  • Mythical
  • Enormous
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is C

Solution and Explanation

Step 1 (Anchor to context).
The line is: “fabulous winged creatures out of legends: an Assyrian lion… winged monkeys, tiny angels, levitating fish.” This is a catalogue of legendary beings. Step 2 (Choose the sense of ‘fabulous’).
“Fabulous” has multiple senses. - Colloquial: “excellent/very good.” - Literal/etymological (from fable): “mythical/legendary.” Given the explicit mention of “out of legends,” the intended sense is mythical. Step 3 (Eliminate distractors).
(A) “very good” and (B) “unbelievable” are modern senses but do not fit the legend list; (D) “enormous” is unrelated. Step 4 (Conclude).
Hence (C) is the correct contextual meaning. \[ \boxed{\text{(C) Mythical}} \]
Was this answer helpful?
0
0

Top Questions on Reading Comprehension

View More Questions

Questions Asked in CLAT exam

View More Questions