| Over Number | Run Rate |
|---|---|
| N-2 | 8.00 |
| N | 7.43 |
| N+2 | 8.11 |
| N+4 | 8.45 |
| N+6 | 8.08 |
To find the value of \( N \), we have to solve the problem using the given conditions and information from the table.
The condition provided is:
Let's solve for \( N \):
Therefore, \( N \) can take values between 3 and 14 inclusive.
Check the run rates condition:
Calculation:
To solve, assume certain values and verify. Checking pairwise differences from known over numbers, the arithmetic point comes valid for N = 7, fulfilling all constraints.
Hence, the answer is the value of \( N \) is 7.
To determine the value of \(N\), consider the scenario provided in the question. We have a table showing the run rate of a cricket team at certain overs in a T20 match. The key condition given is:
According to the table, the run rate at various overs is provided as follows:
| Over Number | Run Rate |
|---|---|
| N-2 | 8.00 |
| N | 7.43 |
| N+2 | 8.11 |
| N+4 | 8.45 |
| N+6 | 8.08 |
The condition \(1 \leq N - 2 < N + 6 \leq 20\) simplifies to:
This implies:
Therefore, the possible values for \(N\) are from 3 to 14 inclusive.
Given the run rate at \(N\) is 7.43, we can calculate it using the formula for the average:
\[ \text{Run Rate} = \frac{\text{Total Runs}}{\text{Number of Overs}} \]
Let \(R_{n-2}, R_{n}, R_{n+2}, R_{n+4}, R_{n+6}\) represent the runs scored in overs \(N-2, N, N+2, N+4, N+6\) respectively. The total runs can be written as a system of equations based on the run rate values:
Substitute and solve for possible \(N\). Checking each value from 7 to 14, we find:
Thus, the correct value of \(N\) is 7.
To solve this problem, we need to determine the correct pair of overs in which the team could have scored a total of 22 runs. We will use the provided data, specifically focusing on the calculation methods and understanding of the problem context.
Given data:
The problem provides the range of runs which can be scored in an over: 6 to 15. The total runs over two overs should be 22.
Let's examine the run rates and calculate possible runs:
Through process of elimination and verification within the constraints, we establish that the correct answer is the pair of overs 9 and 10, which allows for a sum of 22 runs using the potential valid scores per over.
Therefore, the correct answer is: 9 and 10.
To solve this problem, we need to understand how the run rate changes across the overs mentioned in the table, and determine in which pairs of overs the team could have scored a total of 22 runs.
Step 1: Understand the Problem
Given the change in run rate across certain overs, the task is to identify during which over pairs a total of 22 runs were scored. The pair of overs given as options are: 6 and 7, 7 and 8, 8 and 9, 9 and 10, 10 and 11.
The constraints are that no over has less than 6 runs or more than 15 runs.
Step 2: Use the Given Data
From the table, we have certain information about run rates at different points. The run rate at the end of N+6 over is 8.08. Let us consider how this information helps us:
Step 3: Try Different Over Pairs
Let's test the given over pairing options one by one:
Conclusion: Correct Option is 9 and 10
Therefore, after testing all the options, only "9 and 10" allows for an exact total of 22 runs.
To determine in which of the given overs the team must have scored the least number of runs, we need to analyze the run rate at different overs provided and apply logical reasoning.
The relevant data from the table is:
| Over Number | Run Rate |
|---|---|
| N-2 | 8.00 |
| N | 7.43 |
| N+2 | 8.11 |
| N+4 | 8.45 |
| N+6 | 8.08 |
Therefore, the team must have scored the least number of runs in over 7.
Step 1: Analyze the run rates. The run rate decreases at N (from the table in Question 23).
This suggests that a relatively low number of runs was scored in over N − 1 or N.
Step 2: Identify the least runs scored. If N = 7 (from Question 23), the team must have scored the least number of runs in over 7, as the run rate drops at this point, indicating a minimum addition to the total.
Final Answer: 7.
Light Chemicals is an industrial paint supplier with presence in three locations: Mumbai, Hyderabad and Bengaluru. The sunburst chart below shows the distribution of the number of employees of different departments of Light Chemicals. There are four departments: Finance, IT, HR and Sales. The employees are deployed in four ranks: junior, mid, senior and executive. The chart shows four levels: location, department, rank and gender (M: male, F: female). At every level, the number of employees at a location/department/rank/gender are proportional to the corresponding area of the region represented in the chart.
Due to some issues with the software, the data on junior female employees have gone missing. Notice that there are junior female employees in Mumbai HR, Sales and IT departments, Hyderabad HR department, and Bengaluru IT and Finance departments. The corresponding missing numbers are marked u, v, w, x, y and z in the diagram, respectively.
It is also known that:
a) Light Chemicals has a total of 210 junior employees.
b) Light Chemicals has a total of 146 employees in the IT department.
c) Light Chemicals has a total of 777 employees in the Hyderabad office.
d) In the Mumbai office, the number of female employees is 55.

An investment company, Win Lose, recruit's employees to trade in the share market. For newcomers, they have a one-year probation period. During this period, the employees are given Rs. 1 lakh per month to invest the way they see fit. They are evaluated at the end of every month, using the following criteria:
1. If the total loss in any span of three consecutive months exceeds Rs. 20,000, their services are terminated at the end of that 3-month period,
2. If the total loss in any span of six consecutive months exceeds Rs. 10,000, their services are terminated at the end of that 6-month period.
Further, at the end of the 12-month probation period, if there are losses on their overall investment, their services are terminated.
Ratan, Shri, Tamal and Upanshu started working for Win Lose in January. Ratan was terminated after 4 months, Shri was terminated after 7 months, Tamal was terminated after 10 months, while Upanshu was not terminated even after 12 months. The table below, partially, lists their monthly profits (in Rs. ‘000’) over the 12-month period, where x, y and z are masked information.
Note:
• A negative profit value indicates a loss.
• The value in any cell is an integer.
Illustration: As Upanshu is continuing after March, that means his total profit during January-March (2z +2z +0) ≥
Rs.20,000. Similarly, as he is continuing after June, his total profit during January − June ≥
Rs.10,000, as well as his total profit during April-June ≥ Rs.10,000.