Question:

Principle: Nothing is an offence merely by reason of its being done with the knowledge that it is likely to cause harm, if it be done without any criminal intention to cause harm, and in good faith for the purpose of preventing or avoiding other harm to a person or property.
Facts: Mr. Sharman, the Captain of a steam vessel, suddenly and without any fault or negligence on his part, finds himself in such a position that, before he can stop his vessel, he must inevitably run down a boat B, with twenty or thirty passengers on board, unless he changes the course of his vessel, and that, by changing his course, he must incur the risk of running down a boat C with only two passengers on board and which he may possibly clear.

Show Hint

In criminal law, the doctrine of necessity allows certain acts that would normally be offences if they prevent a greater harm.
Updated On: Aug 11, 2025
  • Sharman has committed no offence because this was done out of necessity
  • Sharman can be held responsible for the act of criminal negligence
  • Sharman can be held responsible for culpable homicide
  • This is a clear case of accident so Sharman cannot be held responsible
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is A

Solution and Explanation

The principle provides protection when an act is done in good faith to prevent greater harm, even if it unintentionally causes some harm. Here, Mr. Sharman faced a choice: either hit a crowded boat B or risk hitting a boat C with far fewer passengers. His decision was aimed at preventing greater harm, without criminal intention. Hence, it falls under the doctrine of necessity, making him not liable.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0

Questions Asked in CLAT exam

View More Questions