To solve this question, we need to understand the concept of a vernier caliper and how the least count (LC) is determined. The least count is the smallest measurement a device can accurately measure. For a vernier caliper, the least count is determined by the difference between one main scale division (MSD) and one vernier scale division (VSD).
Given:
This means, in mathematical terms:
\(n \cdot \text{MSD} = (n + 1) \cdot \text{VSD}\)
From the given information:
\(n \cdot m = (n + 1) \cdot \text{VSD}\)
\(\text{VSD} = \frac{n \cdot m}{n + 1}\)
The least count (LC) is then given by the difference between one main scale division and one vernier scale division:
\(\text{LC} = \text{MSD} - \text{VSD}\)
\(\text{LC} = m - \frac{n \cdot m}{n + 1}\)
Simplifying the expression:
\(\text{LC} = \frac{(n + 1) \cdot m - n \cdot m}{n + 1}\)
\(\text{LC} = \frac{m}{n + 1}\)
Therefore, the least count of the vernier caliper is \(\frac{m}{n+1}\).
Conclusion: The correct answer is \(\frac{m}{n+1}\), which matches with the given correct answer option.
This is calculated based on how vernier scales are designed to introduce finer measurements by using a secondary scale (vernier scale) that helps measure fractions of the smallest unit on the main scale.
Step 1: Relationship between main scale and vernier scale Given that:
\[ n \, \text{MSD} = (n + 1) \, \text{VSD}. \]
From this:
\[ 1 \, \text{VSD} = \frac{n}{n + 1} \, \text{MSD}. \]
Step 2: Least count formula The least count (L.C.) of a vernier caliper is given by:
\[ \text{L.C.} = 1 \, \text{MSD} - 1 \, \text{VSD}. \]
Substitute \( 1 \, \text{VSD} \) from Step 1:
\[ \text{L.C.} = m - m \left( \frac{n}{n + 1} \right). \]
Simplify:
\[ \text{L.C.} = m \left[ 1 - \frac{n}{n + 1} \right]. \]
\[ \text{L.C.} = m \left( \frac{n + 1 - n}{n + 1} \right). \]
\[ \text{L.C.} = \frac{m}{n + 1}. \]
Final Answer: \( \frac{m}{n + 1} \).
Match the LIST-I with LIST-II
| LIST-I | LIST-II | ||
| A. | Boltzmann constant | I. | \( \text{ML}^2\text{T}^{-1} \) |
| B. | Coefficient of viscosity | II. | \( \text{MLT}^{-3}\text{K}^{-1} \) |
| C. | Planck's constant | III. | \( \text{ML}^2\text{T}^{-2}\text{K}^{-1} \) |
| D. | Thermal conductivity | IV. | \( \text{ML}^{-1}\text{T}^{-1} \) |
Choose the correct answer from the options given below :


In the first configuration (1) as shown in the figure, four identical charges \( q_0 \) are kept at the corners A, B, C and D of square of side length \( a \). In the second configuration (2), the same charges are shifted to mid points C, E, H, and F of the square. If \( K = \frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon_0} \), the difference between the potential energies of configuration (2) and (1) is given by: