Question:

No minor can enter into a contract of work. Working in a shop can be done only by a contract. Which derivation is correct?

Show Hint

When deriving, combine premises step-by-step to avoid assuming facts not in the statements.
Updated On: Aug 12, 2025
  • A minor cannot work in a shop
  • A shop cannot contract with a minor
  • There cannot be a contract to which a minor is a party
  • None of the above
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is C

Solution and Explanation

Given the statements:
  • No minor can enter into a contract of work.
  • Working in a shop can be done only by a contract.
We need to find the correct derivation based on the provided options. Let's analyze each:
  • A minor cannot work in a shop: This implies a conclusion based on the given statements but doesn't fully cover the legal nuance regarding contracts.
  • A shop cannot contract with a minor: This conclusion focuses on the shop's inability to make a contract but it doesn't clearly encapsulate the derivation from not being able to enter into any contract.
  • There cannot be a contract to which a minor is a party: This directly aligns with the principle that minors cannot enter into contracts, making it the most accurate reflection of the given information.
  • None of the above: Would be correct only if none of the options matched the derivation, but option three does.
The most accurate legal derivation that encompasses the principles regarding minors and contracts is:
There cannot be a contract to which a minor is a party.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0

Questions Asked in CLAT exam

View More Questions