To solve this problem, we must analyze the conditions for the set \( P \) and examine the behavior of the sequence \( (x_n) \). The problem gives us the conditions related to the set \( P \) and links them to the existence of monotonic subsequences. Let's explore each statement logically:
This statement makes use of the Erdős–Szekeres theorem from combinatorics, which states that any sequence of real numbers has a monotonically increasing or decreasing subsequence, whose length depends on whether we consider a finite or infinite set \( P \). If \( P \) is finite, it implies that a large portion of the indices do not belong to \( P \). Thus, within these indices, a monotonically increasing subsequence must exist. Therefore, this statement is true.
This statement is false based on our explanation above. The finiteness of \( P \) ensures the existence of a monotonically increasing subsequence due to the complement of \( P \) being infinite.
If \( P \) is infinite, there are infinitely many indices \( n \) such that \( x_n \) is larger than any \( x_m \) for \( m > n \). This makes the sequence behave in a manner where each of these terms forms the start of a decreasing subsequence by always finding larger terms, indicating the presence of a monotonically decreasing subsequence. Hence, this statement is true.
This statement contradicts the previous correct statement. If \( P \) is infinite, we are guaranteed the existence of a monotonically decreasing subsequence, which invalidates this assertion. Therefore, this statement is false.
Based on the analysis, the correct statements are: